Hey OM

By golly ole timer you hit the nail on the head.

I don't pay no stinking taxes, in the W-4 form I put "EXEMPT" where it
asks for number of deductions, and when I file my 1040 it says at the
end of the form REFUND DUE, in four figures, for the last several
years. Now that is legit, but it sure is WRONG, at least that is what
everyone tells me.

Your trouble is you pay taxes, where as I don't. Now that is energy
density.

73 OM
de n8zu




On Oct 23, 8:25 pm, brian whatcott wrote:
raypsi wrote:
Hey OM:

I tell you what. I took just 1 particle wave [ per sq meter] and shoot the particle
wave into a 60db dish. At the focus I got 1,000,000 particle waves [ per sq meter]. I
mean that is 60 db right?

Yes.



So where did the other 999,999 particles come from? Energy density
from focusing just one particle?

NOW, you're getting it! No more particles, but more particle density,
when the flux is directed tightly...

The two slot experiment buttresses the above.

Take 2 parallel slots shoot just one particle wave into just one slot
and 2 particle waves come out the other side.

73 OM
de n8zu

Actually no. But you probably realized that. Or did you?

I am not pursuing this much further, because you are starting to respond
like a person who wants to drag out an argument.

Listen to me when I say: "I can be wrong. I often am."

Can you say that too, with some sincerity? :-)

Brian W

:-)

raypsi wrote:
Hey OM

By golly ole timer you hit the nail on the head.

I don't pay no stinking taxes, in the W-4 form I put "EXEMPT" where it
asks for number of deductions, and when I file my 1040 it says at the
end of the form REFUND DUE, in four figures, for the last several
years. Now that is legit, but it sure is WRONG, at least that is what
everyone tells me.

Your trouble is you pay taxes, where as I don't. Now that is energy
density.

73 OM
de n8zu

Ah, now I see the real 'problem'

-Bill