Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
Fellow amateur radio operators: Over the past 14-yrs I have been
jackbooted numerous times off of amateur radio discussion groups because I critiqued somewhat less than technically correct statements by a male friend of the moderator/censor. The first moderated discussion group I ever joined was AMPS - back in 1996. Within 3-hours I received a telephone call from the moderator warning me that I would not be allowed to critique statements from W8JI. When I asked if this rule applied to sttements that were technically specious, I was told to go easy. Within a few weeks I had been jackbooted off of AMPS. Thanks to complaints from technically enlighted members of AMPS, I eventually got reinstated but I was eventually jackbooted again for the same reason when we got a new moderator/censor. This happened several times. I can not understand why any sane amateur radio operator would want to participate in a discussion group where specious statements from boyfriends of the censor/modertor are shielded. end -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:17:47 -0700, • R. L. Measures. wrote:
-- "jackbooted" rant snipped - ... and , your homebrew question is ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In article om,
Allodoxaphobia wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:17:47 -0700, • R. L. Measures. wrote: -- "jackbooted" rant snipped - ... and , your homebrew question is ? • zzzzzz zzzz zzzzzzzzzzzz -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In article ,
(• R. L. Measures.) wrote: I can not understand why any sane amateur radio operator would want to participate in a discussion group where specious statements from boyfriends of the censor/modertor are shielded. end -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org maybe it has something to do with the attitude you display on other Newsgroups you frequent...... Me One who has been reading your stuff for YEARS..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In article , Me
wrote: In article , (• R. L. Measures.) wrote: I can not understand why any sane amateur radio operator would want to participate in a discussion group where specious statements from boyfriends of the censor/modertor are shielded. end -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org maybe it has something to do with the attitude you display on other Newsgroups you frequent...... • I'm pretty sure your assumption is spot-on Mr. ______? My problem is that I can not keep quiet when a technical conclusion isn't right. cheers Me One who has been reading your stuff for YEARS..... -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In (• R. L. Measures.)
wrote: Fellow amateur radio operators: Over the past 14-yrs I have been jackbooted numerous times off of amateur radio discussion groups because I critiqued somewhat less than technically correct statements by a male friend of the moderator/censor. Really? Most people have absolutely no problem with moderated groups, which they find pleasantly free of crap. -- Bert Hyman W0RSB St. Paul, MN |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In article , Bert Hyman
wrote: In (• R. L. Measures.) wrote: Fellow amateur radio operators: Over the past 14-yrs I have been jackbooted numerous times off of amateur radio discussion groups because I critiqued somewhat less than technically correct statements by a male friend of the moderator/censor. Really? Most people have absolutely no problem with moderated groups, which they find pleasantly free of crap. • Bert H. are uou comfortable with the statement: that dipmeters are useless because they simultaneously couple to everything within several feet? or how anout: resistance wire has reverse RF skin-effect at HF? -- Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
On 7/2/2010 8:59 PM, • R. L. Measures. wrote:
Fellow amateur radio operators: Over the past 14-yrs I have been jackbooted numerous times off of amateur radio discussion groups because I critiqued somewhat less than technically correct statements by a male friend of the moderator/censor. ..snip.. are you comfortable with the statement: that dipmeters are useless because they simultaneously couple to everything within several feet? or how anout: resistance wire has reverse RF skin-effect at HF? Dip meters do couple to conductors in the near field. Current density of resistive wire does increease with depth. Call that reverse skin effect if you like? Brian W |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated / Unmoderated ?
In message , Bert Hyman
writes In (• R. L. Measures.) wrote: Fellow amateur radio operators: Over the past 14-yrs I have been jackbooted numerous times off of amateur radio discussion groups because I critiqued somewhat less than technically correct statements by a male friend of the moderator/censor. Really? Most people have absolutely no problem with moderated groups, which they find pleasantly free of crap. Over the past 10 years, on several occasions I've tried to post perfectly innocuous and on-topic comments in rec.radio.amateur.moderated. So far, not one has appeared. What am I doing wrong? -- Ian |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REPOST: 3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Policy | |||
3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Equipment | |||
3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Homebrew | |||
Stopping the vandals - Was: RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated | Policy | |||
Stopping the vandals - Was: RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated | General |