Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "amdx" wrote in message ... On the webpage http://www.crystal-radio.eu/engev.htm the author diagrams a crystal radio with Rp as the losses in L1 and C1. Then he goes further and loads L1C1 with an antenna, this reduces Q by 1/2. He then adds we can calculate the value of Rp as follows: Rp=2.pi.f.L.Q (Q Unloaded). My question; Why does he do all further calculations with Rp rather than 1/2Rp, since the Q of L1C1 is reduced to 1/2 by the antenna loading. MikeK I received a reply to my question from the webpage author. "In the formule Rp=2.pi.f.L.Q , I use the Q of the coil in the right-side part of circuit diagram 2. This Q is halve the value of the coil Q in the left-side part of circuit diagram 2. I consider the right side part of diagram 2 to be a new unloaded circuit, with it own unloaded Q. With unloaded I mean here "not loaded with diode or loudspeaker". Maybe one might say; it's not unloaded because the antenne is connected" But as you see in circuit diagram 2, in the right side part, there is no antenne anymore. It's just a new LC circuit with it's own Q value, wich we are gonna load with diode and speaker. The calculated value of Rp is the value which the diode sees, in the situation with the antenna connected" |