Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
advice on cylindrical magnetic core for PTO with 1" micrometric drive
**warning - this is clearly crazy**
** just for fun, so pls bear with me! ** ** calls for sanity -- /dev/null :-D ** Hello everyone! I am considering building a broad tuning range, high impedance HF tank circuit that could be used for several _old-fashioned_ things, like a regen receiver or an analog RF generator, with a pair of twists: - PTO TUNING, as seen in many professional and ham radios, but with very limited tuning range and custom-made slow motion drives. - a generic MICROMETRIC SCREW for tuning slow motion drive was, as I saw in one of Jiri Vackar's patents. PTO HF TUNING I envision using a moving magnetic core either for main tuning or for band setting. A designer of interesting hobby radios by the name of (Sir) Douglas Hall obtained extremely wide tuning ratios with PT coils and extremely small fine-tuning variables, in the order of 10pF, without band-switching on HF, unattainable with variable capacitors. He also claimed better Q over the whole range. But his PT drive was really rough, only good enough for approximate band setting. It should be easy to do better. MICROMETRIC SCREWS Standard mechanical micrometers used for depth or thickness measurement contain a screw that moves a steel rod over a 25mm / 1 inch range. They typically have a resolution of 0.01mm using the venier scale. This implies repositioning to 1 part over 2500 over the full range. Other features are extremely smooth motion, very small backlash, and low price. I also have a thermostat that I could use to heat the whole mechanical arrangement and help stability.... QUESTION Assuming that my favorite HF range is 3-15 MHz and that core travel will be 25mm or less, what core size and mix you propose for best Q and stability over a broad tuning range? MY CURRENT CANDIDATE Amidon cyl. core for HF PTOs R61-050-180 1.8" length x 1/2" diameter, material 61. Excess length is necessary to keep linearity throughout the range. I wish diameter was larger, closer to a roughly square length/diameter ratio, but that's what's available. SECOND BEST (probably WAAAY SECOND) A cylindrical RFI core. I can count many many reasons not to use one, but I wonder if I am grasping at straws. Any comments? Thank you in advance! N1JPR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|