Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rickman" wrote in message
... A higher frequency would imply a smaller L and/or C. How do you combine them to produce that? Consider the two caps to be in series??? Sure. If you bring the 10p over to the primary, it looks like 10p * (30m / 5u), or whatever the ratio was (I don't have it in front of me now), in parallel with the primary. (I misspoke earlier, you can safely ignore Ls, because k = 1. There's no flux which is not common to both windings.) Inductors effectively in parallel also increase the expected resonant frequency. If you have this, .. L1 .. +-----UUU--+------+------+ .. | + | | | .. ( Vsrc ) === C R 3 L2 .. | - | 3 .. | | | | .. +----------+------+------+ .. _|_ GND You might expect the resonant frequency is L2 + C, but it's actually (L1 || L2) = Leq. If L1 is not substantially larger than L2, the resonant frequency will be pulled higher. Incidentally, don't forget to include loss components. I didn't see any explict R on the schematic. I didn't check if you set the LTSpice default parasitic ESR (cap), or DCR or EPR (coil) on the components. Besides parasitic losses, your signal is going *somewhere*, and that "where" consumes power! The actual transmitter is most certainly not a perfect current source inductor, nor is the receiver lossless. This simulation has no expression for radiation in any direction that's not directly between the two antennas: if all the power transmitted by the current source is reflected back, even though it's through a 0.1% coupling coefficient, it has to go somewhere. If it's coming back out the antenna, and it's not being burned in the "transformer", it's coming back into the transmitter. This is at odds with reality, where a 100% reflective antenna doesn't magically smoke a distant transmitter, it simply reflects 99.9% back into space. The transmitter hardly knows. In this example, if you set R very large, you'll see ever more voltage on the output, and ever more current draw from Vsrc. You can mitigate this by increasing L1 still further, but the point is, if the source and load (R) aren't matched in some fashion, the power will reflect back to the transmitter and cause problems (in this case, power reflected back in-phase causes excessive current draw; in the CCS case, reflected power in-phase causes minimal voltage generation and little power transmission). Power is always coming and going somewhere, and if you happen to forget this fact, it'll reflect back and zap you in the butt sooner or later! Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Horn antenna simulation | Antenna | |||
Antenna Simulation Parameters and Folded Dipole Antenna Question... | Antenna | |||
Is there any simulation software of antenna? | Antenna | |||
nec simulation - what is going on with this antenna? | Antenna |