Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6.3.13 9:00 , rickman wrote:
Since the loop is inductive, your first priority is to resonate it with a capacitor at the desired frequency. This will require a very precise value, and even for a single frequency, may require a variable capacitor to account for manufacturing tolerances. In the AM BCB, a Q of 10 gets you 50-160kHz bandwidth, so you only get a few channels for any given tuning position. And if the Q is higher, you get even fewer. Yes, that is loop antenna 101 I think. It was when I added a coupling transformer with 100:1 turns ratio that I was told I needed to consider the parasitics. I have found it is not useful to go much above 25 or 33:1 on the turns ratio. I am receiving a single frequency, 60 kHz. There is no need for a wide bandwidth. Ultimately, I prefer a Q of 100 for the higher gain. If it gets too high, the off tuning by variations (drift) in the parasitic capacitance affects the antenna gain appreciably. Please note that high Q will destroy the modulation sidebands on the signal you're listening to. In aviation, there are non-directional beacons which are transmitting in a frequency around 300 kHz (1 km wavelength). The antennas cannot obviously be of efficient length (250 m / 800 ft), so they are short (20 m / 70 ft) force-tuned to the transmitting frequency. This creates so high Q that the identification modulation sidebands for the customary 1050 Hz audio do not fit in, and the ID is modulated using 400 Hz audio. -- Tauno Voipio, avionics engineer (also OH2UG) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Horn antenna simulation | Antenna | |||
Antenna Simulation Parameters and Folded Dipole Antenna Question... | Antenna | |||
Is there any simulation software of antenna? | Antenna | |||
nec simulation - what is going on with this antenna? | Antenna |