"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

Jerry, over in another newsgroup we are ignoring this noise source. As I
think you have
seen, he never posts anything useful.


Do you mean like your describing someone's wife as a sheep in the bed,
or repeatedly sneering that someone must have Asperger's Syndrome?
What about your claim that reversing the direction of a phasor, a rotating
vector, causes a decreas in its size? What of your claim that Reg Varney,
the comic actor from, "On the Buses" designed the G5RV antenna?

Perhaps it is you, in your own habitual haste to want to abuse your fellow
NG contributors who "never posts anything useful"?

On 6/28/2014 4:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/27/2014 4:18 PM, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I'm trying to find some software, ideally for Linux but MacOS is
acceptable, to design duplexers.
I've located a Windows program but I rarely use Windows and don't use
Wine.
For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.

Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).

Ha has loads of PCs, including Windows ones.



You can't read, either, can you?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/28/2014 4:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/27/2014 4:18 PM, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I'm trying to find some software, ideally for Linux but MacOS is
acceptable, to design duplexers.
I've located a Windows program but I rarely use Windows and don't use
Wine.
For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to
whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.

Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).

Ha has loads of PCs, including Windows ones.



You can't read, either, can you?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/28/2014 4:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/27/2014 4:18 PM, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I'm trying to find some software, ideally for Linux but MacOS is
acceptable, to design duplexers.
I've located a Windows program but I rarely use Windows and don't use
Wine.
For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to
whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.

Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).

Ha has loads of PCs, including Windows ones.



You can't read, either, can you?


"but I rarely use Windows", ie he has the capability.

You can't read, can you?

On 6/28/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/28/2014 4:17 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 6/27/2014 4:18 PM, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I'm trying to find some software, ideally for Linux but MacOS is
acceptable, to design duplexers.
I've located a Windows program but I rarely use Windows and don't use
Wine.
For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to
whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.

Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).

Ha has loads of PCs, including Windows ones.



You can't read, either, can you?


"but I rarely use Windows", ie he has the capability.

You can't read, can you?




That's right. He regularly uses Linux and would have to shut everything
down, boot Windows just to run this one program, then shut down and boot
into Linux again.

He asked for a LINUX solution. And your (typically stoopid) response was:

"For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.

A typical stoopid response.

The difference between ignorant and stoopid - the ignorant are willing
to learn. You are stoopid. And nothing you can ever say or do will
resolve that.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
That's right. He regularly uses Linux and would have to shut everything
down, boot Windows just to run this one program, then shut down and boot
into Linux again.
He asked for a LINUX solution. And your (typically stoopid) response was:
"For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.
A typical stoopid response.
The difference between ignorant and stoopid - the ignorant are willing
to learn. You are stoopid. And nothing you can ever say or do will
resolve that.

UR M3OSN AICMFP

On 6/28/2014 10:49 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
That's right. He regularly uses Linux and would have to shut everything
down, boot Windows just to run this one program, then shut down and boot
into Linux again.
He asked for a LINUX solution. And your (typically stoopid) response was:
"For that type of user program, it will be irrelevant to you as to whether
you use Windows or Linux as the underlying operating system, so use the
Windows package that you already have located.
A typical stoopid response.
The difference between ignorant and stoopid - the ignorant are willing
to learn. You are stoopid. And nothing you can ever say or do will
resolve that.

UR M3OSN AICMFP



ROFLMAO! Easy enough to disprove.

But then I see someone else has your number!


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 6/27/2014 8:10 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:



Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).


Jerry, over in another newsgroup we are ignoring this noise source. As I
think you have
seen, he never posts anything useful.

The hope is he will get the message and go QRT.

Thank you for your input.


BTW Brian, I was talking to some other hams at Field Day today. To get
a license (any license) from the FCC, an individual must be of "good
character". People have been turned down for amateur and commercial
licenses due to not being of good character.

It's too bad Ofcom doesn't have a similar regulation. But obviously a
certain national amateur radio organization does.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 6/29/2014 5:47 AM, Brian Reay wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/27/2014 8:10 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:



Except a Windows program will not run under Linux (many with with Wine,
but he's already said he doesn't wish to install it).


Jerry, over in another newsgroup we are ignoring this noise source. As I
think you have
seen, he never posts anything useful.

The hope is he will get the message and go QRT.

Thank you for your input.


BTW Brian, I was talking to some other hams at Field Day today. To get
a license (any license) from the FCC, an individual must be of "good
character". People have been turned down for amateur and commercial
licenses due to not being of good character.

It's too bad Ofcom doesn't have a similar regulation. But obviously a
certain national amateur radio organization does.


I would dearly like to seem such a rule in the UK Jerry. Sadly, we tend to
be too tolerant of
such people and they even gather in groups to support each other.

I see one of the long standing problem characters in the US amateur radio
scene has finally lost his licence (or license given it is a US one!).


Yes, the wheels of justice sometimes turn very slowly here. But they do
turn.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I would dearly like to seem such a rule in the UK Jerry. Sadly, we tend to
be too tolerant of
such people and they even gather in groups to support each other.

I see one of the long standing problem characters in the US amateur radio
scene has finally lost his licence (or license given it is a US one!).

So you would be in favour of those with a repeatedly-admitted history of
pirating with 19 sets, FTDX560 and FT101E being denied a licence?

What about those who are so reckless as to the effect that their behaviour
endangers their fellow men such that they pick up a speeding conviction?

What, again, of those who commit offences by sending grossly offensive
messages
ove r the Internet about someone's wife being a sheep in the bed, or that a
widely-respected professional must be employed as a lavatory cleaner?

What of those who use the Internet to send messages to the committee of
their local radio club, messages that are riddled with the F-word?

Over to you, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum?