| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Morning folks. I've been observing with sadness the infiltration by Gareth
Alun Evans to rec.radio.* recently and the disruption and rudeness that has followed. Big G is well-known throughout many newsgroups as a troublemaker and pernicious troll. Above all others, he considers uk.radio.amateur as his "home" and his near two-decade history of abuse there is available for all to review in Google Groups. We've had enough of him and his idiocy. So, Project Shun was born. Broadly speaking, Project Shun involves ignoring him en-masse, refusing to be drawn into his trolling, refusing to lower ourselves to his level. In doing so, the master attention-seeker is starved of the attention that he craves. And it's working. Since Project Shun began, ukra has become a significantly more useable group. Not perfect by any means, but for the first time in months there are multiple on-topic and (comparatively) civil discussions taking place and not descending into a morass of bile and hatred. However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). It would be my humble suggestion that participants here also apply Project Shun to drive this malicious and unpleasant troll away. And not only to restore order to your group, but as a defence against the far more unsavoury side of his "personality". As many of you will be aware, Big G was prosecuted and convicted in court after contacting another user's employer with vile insinuations that he was a danger to children (as he worked at a school, I think you can understand the gravity of such an accusation). This was not the first instance of such appalling behaviour, Big G had done exactly the same to several other individuals he had fallen out with on Usenet, making the same vile slur. Separated from many of you by an ocean and a legal jurisdiction, I fear that he may be emboldened to try the same sick stunt with you. Avoid that risk by blanking him completely. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 24/07/14 09:06, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). One of the unintended consequences is that I have now had to start adding Americans to the KF, Stuckle being the first. This is the first addition for quite some time. Let's hope it's the last. -- Spike |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
"Stephen Thomas Cole" wrote in message
... Morning folks. I've been observing with sadness the infiltration by Gareth Alun Evans to rec.radio.* recently and the disruption and rudeness that has followed. Big G is well-known throughout many newsgroups as a troublemaker and pernicious troll. Above all others, he considers uk.radio.amateur as his "home" and his near two-decade history of abuse there is available for all to review in Google Groups. We've had enough of him and his idiocy. So, Project Shun was born. Broadly speaking, Project Shun involves ignoring him en-masse, refusing to be drawn into his trolling, refusing to lower ourselves to his level. In doing so, the master attention-seeker is starved of the attention that he craves. And it's working. Since Project Shun began, ukra has become a significantly more useable group. Not perfect by any means, but for the first time in months there are multiple on-topic and (comparatively) civil discussions taking place and not descending into a morass of bile and hatred. However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). It would be my humble suggestion that participants here also apply Project Shun to drive this malicious and unpleasant troll away. And not only to restore order to your group, but as a defence against the far more unsavoury side of his "personality". As many of you will be aware, Big G was prosecuted and convicted in court after contacting another user's employer with vile insinuations that he was a danger to children (as he worked at a school, I think you can understand the gravity of such an accusation). This was not the first instance of such appalling behaviour, Big G had done exactly the same to several other individuals he had fallen out with on Usenet, making the same vile slur. Separated from many of you by an ocean and a legal jurisdiction, I fear that he may be emboldened to try the same sick stunt with you. Avoid that risk by blanking him completely. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Spike wrote:
On 24/07/14 09:06, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). One of the unintended consequences is that I have now had to start adding Americans to the KF, Stuckle being the first. This is the first addition for quite some time. Let's hope it's the last. Sadly, Jerry played straight into Big G's hands and gave him the attention he lusts after. Hopefully, my posting might help Jerry to see that there are much more effective ways to get at Big G. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:51:11 +0100, Bernie wrote:
he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? Ha! Nice one, Gruff! |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 24/07/2014 09:51, Bernie wrote:
he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? He does appear to be an old-school amateur and I have had some good chat with him however he also seems to enjoy the position of being the lone defender He does not like me because he randomly decided that I was in the army and has labelled me a baby-killer. I have never been in the army but it did not seem to stop him. until that point we seemed to have a fairly cordial relationship on here. That said, there are still a significant number of people who poke the bear and stir him up, if they stopped goading him then a significant percentage of the noise would die away. Ignoring the noise only works if you ignore it. However, after 30+ years online I have seen all the loons, stirrers, trolls and keyboard warriors come and go - sadly often taking a NG or channel with them. Andy |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/24/2014 4:59 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Spike wrote: On 24/07/14 09:06, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). One of the unintended consequences is that I have now had to start adding Americans to the KF, Stuckle being the first. This is the first addition for quite some time. Let's hope it's the last. Sadly, Jerry played straight into Big G's hands and gave him the attention he lusts after. Hopefully, my posting might help Jerry to see that there are much more effective ways to get at Big G. You can look at it both ways. He's so predictable that he's easy to lead on. Trolls like him can be a lot of fun. I'd love to see him try to contact my employer with such accusations - they would get a huge laugh on it. Also, just because there are jurisdictional differences doesn't mean legal action can't be taken against him. The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. Here in the U.S. his license would very probably not be renewed due to his court case. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:51:11 +0100, "Bernie" wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? Quite true, Gareth has every right to express his views and have them debated. If you disagree then debate it. It's quite possible to hold a gentlemanly disagreement and this has happened on many occasions, with no harm done. The ones trying to "shun" are indeed his chief abusers, and responsible for much trouble in the NG's whilst claiming to be holier than thou. What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/24/2014 10:40 AM, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:23:23 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. I think any such requirement would be struck down under UK and/or European law. I am surprised that it still stands in the US, perhaps it only applies to observed character traits related to use of radio? Nope, it can apply to non-radio related convictions, also. A radio license is a privilege, not a right. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:33:18 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay
wrote: Rambo wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:51:11 +0100, "Bernie" wrote: Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? Quite true, Gareth has every right to express his views and have them debated. If you disagree then debate it. It's quite possible to hold a gentlemanly disagreement and this has happened on many occasions, with no harm done. The ones trying to "shun" are indeed his chief abusers, and responsible for much trouble in the NG's whilst claiming to be holier than thou. What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! Your problem is you have no idea how a gentleman behaves. He doesn't send malicious emails or call people nonces, perverts, etc. Nor does he make up a string of false accusations about peoples' families. Neither doyou Brian. Do you deny then that you and your chum have been goading and making false allegations against Gareth for years? He doesn't claim to have progressed to a Full licence when he hasn't either. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:33:18 +0000, Brian Reay wrote:
He doesn't claim to have progressed to a Full licence when he hasn't either. How about being economical with the truth in order to get an account with a news provider who'd previously banned him? |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/24/2014 4:59 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: Spike wrote: On 24/07/14 09:06, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). One of the unintended consequences is that I have now had to start adding Americans to the KF, Stuckle being the first. This is the first addition for quite some time. Let's hope it's the last. Sadly, Jerry played straight into Big G's hands and gave him the attention he lusts after. Hopefully, my posting might help Jerry to see that there are much more effective ways to get at Big G. You can look at it both ways. He's so predictable that he's easy to lead on. Trolls like him can be a lot of fun. I'd love to see him try to contact my employer with such accusations - they would get a huge laugh on it. Also, just because there are jurisdictional differences doesn't mean legal action can't be taken against him. If/when you need to launch a legal action, theres an awful lot of background info in the Google archive that your legal team can call on. The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. Here in the U.S. his license would very probably not be renewed due to his court case. A very sensible system. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Rambo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:51:11 +0100, "Bernie" wrote: Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? Quite true, Gareth has every right to express his views and have them debated. If you disagree then debate it. It's quite possible to hold a gentlemanly disagreement and this has happened on many occasions, with no harm done. The ones trying to "shun" are indeed his chief abusers, and responsible for much trouble in the NG's whilst claiming to be holier than thou. What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! I think you just got trolled, Hambo. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Rambo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:33:18 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay wrote: Neither doyou Brian. Do you deny then that you and your chum have been goading and making false allegations against Gareth for years? He doesn't claim to have progressed to a Full licence when he hasn't either. Hambo, do you deny that you haven't progressed to a full licence? -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Brian Morrison wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:23:23 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. I think any such requirement would be struck down under UK and/or European Law. All the more reason to leave the EU and review our acceptance of EU law- which some European countries ignore when they feel like it. Should those who are so reckless about the effects of their behaviour on their fellow man to the extent that they pick up a criminal conviction for speeding, or those who recount their many instances of operating HF equipment without a licence also be covered by your holier-than-thou attitude? |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Your problem is you have no idea how a gentleman behaves. He doesn't send malicious emails I have never sent malicous emails, unlike you, who has originated malicious posts to several people in this NG, as you do so below ... Nor does he make up a string of false accusations about peoples' families. .... like saying that someone's wife is a sheep in the bed, do you mean? He doesn't claim to have progressed to a Full licence when he hasn't either. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/24/2014 12:40 PM, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:44:15 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/24/2014 10:40 AM, Brian Morrison wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:23:23 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. I think any such requirement would be struck down under UK and/or European law. I am surprised that it still stands in the US, perhaps it only applies to observed character traits related to use of radio? Nope, it can apply to non-radio related convictions, also. A radio license is a privilege, not a right. Does the US apply that requirement to a driving licence? Nowhere I know of. But drivers licenses are issued by the individual states; radio licenses by the feds. So the comparison is moot. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/24/2014 12:03 PM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/24/2014 4:59 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: Spike wrote: On 24/07/14 09:06, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: However, there are unintended (but not unforeseen, as Big G is a predictable beast) consequences. The abuse and attention-seeking has shifted from ukra to rrah (and other newsgroups). One of the unintended consequences is that I have now had to start adding Americans to the KF, Stuckle being the first. This is the first addition for quite some time. Let's hope it's the last. Sadly, Jerry played straight into Big G's hands and gave him the attention he lusts after. Hopefully, my posting might help Jerry to see that there are much more effective ways to get at Big G. You can look at it both ways. He's so predictable that he's easy to lead on. Trolls like him can be a lot of fun. I'd love to see him try to contact my employer with such accusations - they would get a huge laugh on it. Also, just because there are jurisdictional differences doesn't mean legal action can't be taken against him. If/when you need to launch a legal action, theres an awful lot of background info in the Google archive that your legal team can call on. The thing I regret is that OFCOM doesn't have a character requirement. Here in the U.S. his license would very probably not be renewed due to his court case. A very sensible system. Steve, It was a joke. He can try to contact my employer, but it won't do any good (I own the company). But it also doesn't matter. I've seen much worse trolls on the internet. He doesn't even rank "wanna-be" compared to some. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 24/07/2014 16:33, Brian Reay wrote:
Your problem is you have no idea how a gentleman behaves. He doesn't send malicious emails or call people nonces, perverts, etc. Nor does he make up a string of false accusations about peoples' families. Don't be too hard on yourself Brian, Stephen still loves you. He doesn't claim to have progressed to a Full licence when he hasn't either. Neither does he lose any vestige of self respect by taking out a childs licence. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
"Rambo" wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:51:11 +0100, "Bernie" wrote: Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone he has some weird ideas it is true and is unduly sensitive to criticism, sure, but he looks to be a pukka amateur of the old school. what have you got against him looking at your posts over a few days especially your scurrilous remarks about his sex life are you sure the problem is'nt at your end somewhere? Quite true, Gareth has every right to express his views and have them debated. If you disagree then debate it. It's quite possible to hold a gentlemanly disagreement and this has happened on many occasions, with no harm done. The ones trying to "shun" are indeed his chief abusers, and responsible for much trouble in the NG's whilst claiming to be holier than thou. What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/25/2014 6:15 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
"Kraftee" wrote: What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... Rambo has a peculiar idea of free speech. It seems it only applies to those he agrees with or to subjects he agrees with. Otherwise it is classed as goading. A bit like his idea of being more highly qualified, which is very peculiar. It makes me wonder if Rambo is one of Gareth's aliases. After all, it's hard to believe anyone is as stoopid as Gareth. But I guess in this world there are people that stoopid. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:39:39 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
It was a joke. The trouble is that Gareth and his camp followers are once again messing up perfectly good groups. If only they would stay in ukra. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 27/07/14 11:51, Wymsey wrote:
The trouble is that Gareth and his camp followers are once again messing up perfectly good groups. If only they would stay in ukra. Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. Just wait until Gareth gets home this evening - he's gonna Squeem, and squeem, and squeem, until he makes us all sick. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
Wymsey wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:39:39 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: It was a joke. The trouble is that Gareth and his camp followers are once again messing up perfectly good groups. If only they would stay in ukra. This is a new level of hypocrisy from Chaz here, not least of all due to his pointless cross-post. Then again, hypocrisy and trolling go hand in hand, and I think it's becoming clear that that's Chaz's game. Disgraceful behaviour. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:10:58 +0100, Osama Bean Laden wrote:
Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. No. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 27/07/14 12:14, Wymsey wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:10:58 +0100, Osama Bean Laden wrote: Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. No. He's the only camp follower he's got. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:20:55 +0100, Osama Bean Laden wrote:
Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. No. He's the only camp follower he's got. Hardly, wherever he goes to stir the mire a whole troop of mud chuckers is not far behind. Just sin bins the lot of 'em :-) -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:10:58 +0100, Osama Bean Laden
wrote: On 27/07/14 11:51, Wymsey wrote: The trouble is that Gareth and his camp followers are once again messing up perfectly good groups. If only they would stay in ukra. Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. I don't think I can be described in any as "camp". |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:52:34 -0400, Jerry Stuckle
wrote: On 7/25/2014 6:15 PM, Brian Reay wrote: "Kraftee" wrote: What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... Rambo has a peculiar idea of free speech. It seems it only applies to those he agrees with or to subjects he agrees with. Otherwise it is classed as goading. A bit like his idea of being more highly qualified, which is very peculiar. It makes me wonder if Rambo is one of Gareth's aliases. After all, it's hard to believe anyone is as stoopid as Gareth. But I guess in this world there are people that stoopid. I'll choose my friends Jerry, despite what you or anyone else claim. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/24/2014 4:06 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Morning folks. I've been observing with sadness the infiltration by Gareth Alun Evans to rec.radio.* recently and the disruption and rudeness that has followed. Seems to me that there are two things these groups like to talk about. The second one is radio. Just say NO! and that includes talking about not talking to him. -- Rick |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/27/2014 5:20 PM, Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:52:34 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/25/2014 6:15 PM, Brian Reay wrote: "Kraftee" wrote: What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... Rambo has a peculiar idea of free speech. It seems it only applies to those he agrees with or to subjects he agrees with. Otherwise it is classed as goading. A bit like his idea of being more highly qualified, which is very peculiar. It makes me wonder if Rambo is one of Gareth's aliases. After all, it's hard to believe anyone is as stoopid as Gareth. But I guess in this world there are people that stoopid. I'll choose my friends Jerry, despite what you or anyone else claim. No problem. You can make all of the bad decisions you want. Doesn't bother me a bit. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 23:48:50 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay
wrote: Rambo wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:10:58 +0100, Osama Bean Laden wrote: On 27/07/14 11:51, Wymsey wrote: The trouble is that Gareth and his camp followers are once again messing up perfectly good groups. If only they would stay in ukra. Camp followers? Ah, you mean Rambo. I don't think I can be described in any as "camp". There must be some psychological reason you picked your posting name and you keep bragging about your supposed physical achievements etc. If the dichotomy between those and the truth is anything like it is between your technical qualification claims and knowledge, then ......... Wrong on both counts I'm afraid. My posting name was not derived with the film character in mind. |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400, Jerry Stuckle
wrote: On 7/27/2014 5:20 PM, Rambo wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:52:34 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/25/2014 6:15 PM, Brian Reay wrote: "Kraftee" wrote: What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... Rambo has a peculiar idea of free speech. It seems it only applies to those he agrees with or to subjects he agrees with. Otherwise it is classed as goading. A bit like his idea of being more highly qualified, which is very peculiar. It makes me wonder if Rambo is one of Gareth's aliases. After all, it's hard to believe anyone is as stoopid as Gareth. But I guess in this world there are people that stoopid. I'll choose my friends Jerry, despite what you or anyone else claim. No problem. You can make all of the bad decisions you want. Doesn't bother me a bit. I won't lose any sleep over your or anyone else's opinions either . |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/28/2014 11:40 AM, Rambo wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/27/2014 5:20 PM, Rambo wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:52:34 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/25/2014 6:15 PM, Brian Reay wrote: "Kraftee" wrote: What give them the right to deny the free speech of others... Nothing! But when he starts to stalk other posters within 2 or 3 posts, that is beyond the pale.... Rambo has a peculiar idea of free speech. It seems it only applies to those he agrees with or to subjects he agrees with. Otherwise it is classed as goading. A bit like his idea of being more highly qualified, which is very peculiar. It makes me wonder if Rambo is one of Gareth's aliases. After all, it's hard to believe anyone is as stoopid as Gareth. But I guess in this world there are people that stoopid. I'll choose my friends Jerry, despite what you or anyone else claim. No problem. You can make all of the bad decisions you want. Doesn't bother me a bit. I won't lose any sleep over your or anyone else's opinions either . Neither will anyone else. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 28/07/14 16:38, Rambo wrote:
Wrong on both counts I'm afraid. My posting name was not derived with the film character in mind. Is it because you smell like a goat i.e. RamBO? |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
In message om, Osama
Bean Laden writes On 28/07/14 16:38, Rambo wrote: Wrong on both counts I'm afraid. My posting name was not derived with the film character in mind. Is it because you smell like a goat i.e. RamBO? Could it be a typo for 'Rumpo' (as in Rambling Syd) which went undetected for so long that it stuck? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBZGW9cguTs -- Ian |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 30/07/2014 09:24, Brian Reay wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote: In message om, Osama Bean Laden writes On 28/07/14 16:38, Rambo wrote: Wrong on both counts I'm afraid. My posting name was not derived with the film character in mind. Is it because you smell like a goat i.e. RamBO? Could it be a typo for 'Rumpo' (as in Rambling Syd) which went undetected for so long that it stuck? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBZGW9cguTs Back to the camp thing..... http://www.unionglobaltech.com/produ...dripper-rambo/ I'll leave the punch-line to others ;) |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 30/07/14 09:37, Peter Able wrote:
On 30/07/2014 09:24, Brian Reay wrote: Ian Jackson wrote: In message om, Osama Bean Laden writes On 28/07/14 16:38, Rambo wrote: Wrong on both counts I'm afraid. My posting name was not derived with the film character in mind. Is it because you smell like a goat i.e. RamBO? Could it be a typo for 'Rumpo' (as in Rambling Syd) which went undetected for so long that it stuck? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBZGW9cguTs Back to the camp thing..... http://www.unionglobaltech.com/produ...dripper-rambo/ I'll leave the punch-line to others ;) I don't think it needs a punch-line! ;-) |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
On 7/31/2014 7:41 AM, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:36:13 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: Does the US apply that requirement to a driving licence? Nowhere I know of. But drivers licenses are issued by the individual states; radio licenses by the feds. So the comparison is moot. That distinction doesn't exist in the UK, but I can see that it's a different situation to some extent. What would cause a driving licence to be revoked in your state, other than the usual medical conditions/DUI type offences? That is immaterial. The fact is - it is the law in the United States, and the FCC enforces it. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Project Shun: An intro for rec.radio.* users
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Amateur radio is a privilege, keeping scum out of the hobby should be an issue for anyone who cares about the hobby. The scum who regularly post racist pronography and gratuitously insulting personal remarks in this NG, for example? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com