Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Brian Reay wrote:
Lostgallifreyan wrote: Brian Reay wrote in news:558999594430351400.971108no.sp- : They tend to be fine for thin steal (eg car panels if you are fitting an antenna) Good point. I don't drive or own any large boatanchors so I'm not used to thinking of non-portable or unsupported surfaces. It may even be easier to improvise with a slightly wrong hole punch (or aim small and file outwards) and some large washers than to attempt the way I usually do things. For small round holes of unspecified size I have never beaten an M3 pilot hole followed by a tapered reamer, deburring the result with a Stanley blade. That is VERY cheap, I started out that way and it was a couple of years before I needed anything better. Well, as you probably know, real precision holes (eg in watches) are pilot drilled and reamed, rather than drilled to size. The Stanley blade is not, however, part of the procedure. ;-) A fine broach would be used I would think. I've repaired a number of pocket watches and clocks but always by hunting down new parts if needed, or getting them made. Sadly, my dexterity isn't up to it these days, although it has been improving recently- much to my surprise- plus I've learned to use my left hand more. I may rebuild my modest collection of pocket watches, stolen some years back. They were all ones I had restored, rather than simply bought working. It is surprise that, even for quite old movements, you can still locate new, old stock, parts. I recall a trek to a dusting shop in Notting Hill for a part for a 1920s gold hunter. The shop owner looked at the details and the broken part, thought for about 2 mins, turn to an array of 100s of little draws, and produced one. The price? £1. The watch was worth many times that. I return to the shop many times, it was always the same. He always had a queue of others with similar wants. He fail once, a balance staff for an 1883 cylinder escapement. I had that made, £5, inc. fitting to the balance. He did have a suitable main spring and crystal glass. I expect both watches ended up being sold for scrap gold and silver when the toe rags fenced them. The culprits were caught but the items were not recovered. Have you read this book "Longitude", I can't remember the author? (It's rom about a decade ago.) It's a small book, more like an long essay, about why a chronometer was needed for travel, and the prize and ultimate entries to create a working chronometer that could be portable. Things I'd never thought of. And surely the basis for common watches that came later. All my life I've had watches, starting with mechanical, and even those tended to keep pretty good time, likely fallout from that chronometer work. And of course in recent years, I have a watch that syncs up from the time signal, so it is very much close to "absolute" time, for the purposes of everyday timekeeping. Or a GPS, bought at a garage sale for five dollars, a tiny little thing but amazing technology that couldn't be built in that small a package (let alone imagined) forty years ago. Michael |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|