| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob Judd wrote in message ...
Tom Bruhns wrote: In a real diode, the change in slope is gradual with no sharp corners, but if you could find a diode which looked like, say, 1000 ohms in the reverse direction for all voltages and 1000.1 ohms in the forward direction, it would still work as a detector, albeit a poor one. Son, that's called a Selenium rectifier. Goddam newbies. ![]() Now if you'd mentioned copper oxide, I might have been mildly impressed... ;-) Seems like there were some iron based ones, too. And then there's the coherer... Not all early detectors were insensitive, however. Have a look at the Marconi detector which uses a moving magnetic band. Seems like we had a thread here about it a few years ago, and there was a nice article about it in EW+WW. All the seleniums I ever used ('cept for the shorted ones) worked a whole lot better than 10001:10000! Cheers, Tom |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Noise and Loops Question | Antenna | |||
| transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment | |||
| transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment | |||
| Seperation question???? thanks | Antenna | |||
| Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||