Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Bruhns wrote:
"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote in message ... Is there also an issue about harmonic content? ISTR there is no significant harmonic filtering after that amp, so any replacement needs to be operating well below its quoted maximum power output (which will be at 1dB compression, where significant harmonic output is guaranteed). Depending on the detailed schematic, might the input and output match also be important? Are any filters or attenuators relying on this amp for their wideband 50R source load or source? If there is no fixed attenuator pad at the output, then the variable attenuator is relying on the accuracy of the amp's output impedance (at least at high output levels, ie low attenuation). This might be a case for using push-pull, to reduce the even harmonics, if you can find suitable wideband transformers. Four GALIs of some kind in push-pull parallel might do the job nicely... but if you want to get it as right as HP did in the original design, it ain't trivial. I shouldn't have said that - I'm now too scared to switch on my 8640A! All good points, Ian. Indeed there's no filtering after the amplifier, so if you want to keep the harmonic content low, you will want a decent amplifier there. Also, the output power should be at least +23dBm if you want to have the same performance as the original. However, I believe the output is leveled (or at least monitored), so the output impedance is irrelevant, except perhaps on the highest range where the source impedance may depend on the amplifier output impedance. Good point. I could have a closer look at the schematic (and in the HP Journal article about the 8640B) if anyone has a serious need to know some more details. Are those old HPJs on the web anywhere? It may have been in this group a while ago that mention was made of the way the 8640 generates its output bands: an oscillator from about 250 to 500MHz, with digital divide-by-2 stages followed by LC filters to attenuate the harmonics. Someone said, I believe, that there is only one filter per octave. That is not the case with my 8640M, which on the higher bands has two filters per octave, one for the low half and one for the high half of the band, which are somehow automatically switched. I didn't look into just how the switch point was determined. There's a mechanical switch on the slide-rule tuning mechanism. But the true glory of the 8640 series is the way it keeps the FM deviation constant when more dividers are switched in. Who else but HP would have used a differential gearbox? -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathkit SB-102 SSB voice low | Equipment | |||
Adding an IF output | Equipment | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna |