Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:30:43 +0100, gareth wrote:
Being somewhat of a polymath (just spent all day fence judging at a horse trial) I find that I have a string of ideas faster than I could ever implement them (rather unkindly described in one area as vapourware), but I think it to be useful to punt them for a wider discussion. Musing upon the Huff-and-Puff technique, I wondered if there was a better way to improve the frequency stability of older RXs, because the Huff-and-Puff necessarily brings about a punctuated frequency span (eg, multiples of 32 Hz), and this is what I came up with ... Using the ubiquitous timers to be found en masse in most micros that seem to sell for only a few pence / cents these days, implement a frequency counter to measure the local oscillator. Then, when the user presses a Lock button (yet to be provided) the same micro can program an si570 to generate the same frequency indefinitely and to switch the mixer stage from the original to this new oscillator. If you are going to go to those lengths, why not program the micro to recognise the difference between rapid changes of frequency (tuning) and slower changes (drift) and apply a correctional voltage to a varactor in the case of the latter. Capture range may be a problem if the radio is a determined drifter. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
Accuracy of Q meters | Antenna | |||
VU4 log accuracy... | Dx |