Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, rickman wrote:
On 10/5/2014 2:30 PM, gareth wrote: Being somewhat of a polymath (just spent all day fence judging at a horse trial) I find that I have a string of ideas faster than I could ever implement them (rather unkindly described in one area as vapourware), but I think it to be useful to punt them for a wider discussion. Musing upon the Huff-and-Puff technique, I wondered if there was a better way to improve the frequency stability of older RXs, because the Huff-and-Puff necessarily brings about a punctuated frequency span (eg, multiples of 32 Hz), and this is what I came up with ... Using the ubiquitous timers to be found en masse in most micros that seem to sell for only a few pence / cents these days, implement a frequency counter to measure the local oscillator. Then, when the user presses a Lock button (yet to be provided) the same micro can program an si570 to generate the same frequency indefinitely and to switch the mixer stage from the original to this new oscillator. Gareth really had me going on this one. I was actually thinking of building this. But there is only one problem with the idea. To use the Si570 as the VFO for a receiver it would need to output a sine wave. However the Si570 outputs square waves for digital circuitry. I don't think the mixer would appreciate all the harmonics produced in a square wave would it? Since a lot of mixers wnat to be driven hard, the square wave may not matter. About 1974, there was an article in Ham Radio for a phasing type direct conversion SSB receiver, and he used ECL to generate the needed signal to the mixers that were 90degrees apart. He didn't seem to find the square wave an issue. A bit later, someone did an article in Ham Radio wondering about this sort of thing, and he tried square waves with a mosfet mixer, and a 1496 type mixer, and I thought he found the outcome wasn't a problem with a square wave. If the input to the mixer isnt' well filtered, then I think you're going to get all kinds of weird responses, since something can mix with a harmonic of the oscillator and be converted down to the IF. But you'd generally want good front end filtering, for other reasons. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
an example of delerans accuracy | Shortwave | |||
Accuracy of Q meters | Antenna | |||
VU4 log accuracy... | Dx |