"Kevin Aylward" wrote in message ...

[snipped much voluminous banter]

Whilst, I do agree that Win is very knowledgeable and an expert, I am
also an expert. I have been doing this rather a long time as well you
know. The fact that I am not an academic is not relevant. In all
honesty, there is not much I don't know about general analogue design,
although, obviously, I don't claim to know it all. Does Win know more
than me? Unlikely. Or do I know more than Win. Unlikely. However, we may
well know different things.

[snipped more banter]

Does the above pose a question, or is it mere rhetoric? Could the
scientific method be applied with gusto? Are Win and Kev evenly
matched? The surname of this forum is *design*. I, for one, would
prefer to see this hypothesis tested by deeds rather than by words. On
this forum, I don't care if its spelled analogue or analog - just make
it work and explain why. IMO, no one here needs to prove anything;
however, it would certaily be interesting to watch such a *contest* if
it were all in good fun and sport.

Best Regards,

Frank Raffaeli
http://www.aomwireless.com/