Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kevin Aylward wrote: gwhite wrote: "Eric C. Weaver" wrote: This discussion happens all the time on comp.dsp, between primarily computer-science folks approaching DSP and EE types approaching it. EE folks' definition of "linear" implicitly includes time invariance; Interesting thought since a Signals and Systems course, or a Linear Systems course, or a Communications course is often required to get an EE degree. After all, these courses explicitly distinguish the linearity property and the time-invariance property. And I've never seen the "af(t) = f(at)" so-called "definition" until a few days ago. Your a liar. LOL. Its that simple. I clearly stated that it was *not* a definition. "Linearity can more easily be expressed as: a(f(t)) = f(at)" -- Kevin Aylward I think someone is posting under your name. A nasty bit of business that is. It was simply trying to illustrate the concept of constant gain. You expanding on some trivial minor point to avoid answering the main issue, to wit, you have failed to disprove my claim on your class A amplifier. Class A works just fine in multipliers/modulators -- "non-linearity" of circuit elements is not required. Maybe you can analyze the old MC1496. That would be enlightening to you. But more important and more simple (it will save you loads of time), just apply *the* linearity test for h(t) x(t) - y(t). The notion that y=x^2 is a non-linear equation is universally accepted by anyone who has done even the slightest bit of theory on basic algebraic equations. It does not require any qualification in the slightest. No ****, by why are you rambling on and on about it? Show me one, and I mean just one, that declares y=x^2 a linear equation. That is clever -- you want me to "declare" something is true that I've made no reference to. You are quite the inventor. Face it: you had an incorrect notion about linearity. All the rest of your words are twisting, squirming, and turning to try to save face after you acted condescending (and still do) about a very simple matter. That's all. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? new thread, new beginning, kinda ? | Antenna | |||
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits | Antenna |