Kevin Aylward wrote:

I think you have still missed an important point here. Yes, I agree that
there is some truth in this, and this is a pretty obvious analysis, but
it is not that significant. The most important facter is good gene
stock.

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

Roy McCammon wrote:
Kevin Aylward wrote:

I think you have still missed an important point here. Yes, I agree
that there is some truth in this, and this is a pretty obvious
analysis, but it is not that significant. The most important facter
is good gene stock.

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

Indeed. This is essentially the way it works.

So, as far as picking up women, one must always act in such a manner as
she would want in her offspring. Walk tall, show no sign of weakness
etc... The best way to pick up a women is to make sure that your with
lots of other women. They want offspring that are similar attractive
with other women. For, men its big bad news if a women is seen with lots
of men. Too much probability that she's having someone's else genes, and
as you say, having some sucker pick upon the rearing tab.

Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:18:00 GMT, Roy McCammon
wrote:

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

I assume your comment is made in jest, but there *are* wimmin out
there who will do this. One case that springs to mind was this poor
sap who lived in Texas (IIRC) who was ostensibly happily married; he
and his "wonderful wife" had been "blessed" with four "beautiful
children" - as invariably happens in America, of course. :-) Anway,
some chance event led to the discovery that one of the kids couldn't
possibly have been this father's. It was thought that was the extent
of the infidelity, but it turned out on further investigation that
*none* of the children were his *and* they all had *different*
fathers! Understandalby the poor ******* was devastated when he
learned this - as indeed where the children; they'd all grown very
close to him and he to they during their lives. Most were in their
teens. Bad time for such revelations. :-(
I'll wager that bitch had some explaining to do! :-
--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Paul Burridge wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:18:00 GMT, Roy McCammon
wrote:

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

I assume your comment is made in jest, but there *are* wimmin out
there who will do this.

No its not in jest. There has really been a good deal of real research
done on this. In fact, the was a TV program on it the other day. The
researches get women to rate people based on attractiveness. There are
well studied features that relate facial features and behaviour, for
example "manly" or "caring" characteristics. They show that during the
critical ovulation period, women much prefer the manly faces rather then
the caring faces, and visa versa doing other times.

Of course, women don't generally do this consciously, but it is the way
it is. As I said, whatever strategy results in the best Replicators, is
what we observe.

And to Roy, it occurred to me that you may have misunderstood my comment
on "women selects", I was of course, meaning selects to have sex with,
not as a long term partner.

Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Kevin Aylward wrote:

And to Roy, it occurred to me that you may have misunderstood my comment
on "women selects", I was of course, meaning selects to have sex with,
not as a long term partner.

I was distinguishing between "selects to have sex with"
vs "selects to get pregent by"

Kevin Aylward wrote:

And to Roy, it occurred to me that you may have misunderstood my comment
on "women selects", I was of course, meaning selects to have sex with,
not as a long term partner.

I was distinguishing between "selects to have sex with"
vs "selects to get pregent by"

Paul Burridge wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:18:00 GMT, Roy McCammon
wrote:

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

I assume your comment is made in jest, but there *are* wimmin out
there who will do this.

No its not in jest. There has really been a good deal of real research
done on this. In fact, the was a TV program on it the other day. The
researches get women to rate people based on attractiveness. There are
well studied features that relate facial features and behaviour, for
example "manly" or "caring" characteristics. They show that during the
critical ovulation period, women much prefer the manly faces rather then
the caring faces, and visa versa doing other times.

Of course, women don't generally do this consciously, but it is the way
it is. As I said, whatever strategy results in the best Replicators, is
what we observe.

And to Roy, it occurred to me that you may have misunderstood my comment
on "women selects", I was of course, meaning selects to have sex with,
not as a long term partner.

Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Paul Burridge wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:18:00 GMT, Roy McCammon
wrote:


Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.


I assume your comment is made in jest,

no, I believe that they are pretty much wired that way.

Paul Burridge wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:18:00 GMT, Roy McCammon
wrote:


Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.


I assume your comment is made in jest,

no, I believe that they are pretty much wired that way.

Roy McCammon wrote:
Kevin Aylward wrote:

I think you have still missed an important point here. Yes, I agree
that there is some truth in this, and this is a pretty obvious
analysis, but it is not that significant. The most important facter
is good gene stock.

Heck, I thought her strategy was to latch on to the
best provider and then during that small period of maximum
fertility sneak out and laid by the biggest baddest stud
available.

Indeed. This is essentially the way it works.

So, as far as picking up women, one must always act in such a manner as
she would want in her offspring. Walk tall, show no sign of weakness
etc... The best way to pick up a women is to make sure that your with
lots of other women. They want offspring that are similar attractive
with other women. For, men its big bad news if a women is seen with lots
of men. Too much probability that she's having someone's else genes, and
as you say, having some sucker pick upon the rearing tab.

Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.