Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the PROBLEM it that none of us own a big Company.
so it's better to stock up the shack with the best I hate to be the one to break the news to you but the diode mfg doesn't really care much about the 10 diodes you are going to buy -) They are going to mfg what the big company wants to buy. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:39:33 -0700, "Bob"
wrote: Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. While the 1 kV 1N4007 is definitely a different creature (with some PIN diode characteristics) compared to the lower voltage 1N4001-1N4006 rectifiers, I very much doubt that they make separate wafers for 1N4001, 1N4002 etc. but instead try to make, say a 500 V rectifier. My guess is that they just measure the reverse leakage voltage at various voltages and print a different label, based on these measurements. Those passing only the 50 V test will be labelled 1N4001 and sold at a slightly lower price and so on. If there is a huge order for 1N4001 and there is not enough 50 V units produced, some units tested OK for 100-500 V are labelled 1N4001 to full fill the large order. Thus, some selected 1N4001 parts may work even above 100 V. Paul OH3LWR |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:39:33 -0700, "Bob"
wrote: Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. While the 1 kV 1N4007 is definitely a different creature (with some PIN diode characteristics) compared to the lower voltage 1N4001-1N4006 rectifiers, I very much doubt that they make separate wafers for 1N4001, 1N4002 etc. but instead try to make, say a 500 V rectifier. My guess is that they just measure the reverse leakage voltage at various voltages and print a different label, based on these measurements. Those passing only the 50 V test will be labelled 1N4001 and sold at a slightly lower price and so on. If there is a huge order for 1N4001 and there is not enough 50 V units produced, some units tested OK for 100-500 V are labelled 1N4001 to full fill the large order. Thus, some selected 1N4001 parts may work even above 100 V. Paul OH3LWR |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick Carroll; wrote:
W7TI wrote: On 3 Sep 2003 10:13:00 -0700, (Mike Silva) wrote: Another question resulting from too much time on my hands. Why do we have rectifier diodes (e.g. 1N4xxx, 1N54xx) with different voltage ratings? Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? 73, Mike, KK6GM __________________________________________________ _______ $$$ -- Bill, W7TI Yep. And I'd wager if one did breakdown tests on a variety of diodes many would show the same specs regardless of their different markings. Another pet peeve- Several times I've seen failure of low voltage capacitors which were run too close to their ratings for comfort, IMO. Like 16 vdc rated on a 13.8 DC line in mobile gear. Spikes are sure to take 'em out eventually, it would seem. Why designers do that I've never understood, and I never replace them as rated, but use 25 or 30 volt caps. Never had a problem from doing that, and no repeats. I remember years ago troubleshooting a dead board in an Atlas 210 transciever that had a shorted - leaky 16 volt rated electrolytic across a 13.8 dc line on the board. But it still had enough internal resistance that it didn't smoke anything, just killed the operation of the board. I cussed the (unknown) designer of that thing for awhile! /:-D)) Dick, Electrolytics should be run near their rated voltage to "form" properly. The spikes should be taken out by a parallel 100nF cap, or clipped by a zener. Rob |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick Carroll; wrote:
W7TI wrote: On 3 Sep 2003 10:13:00 -0700, (Mike Silva) wrote: Another question resulting from too much time on my hands. Why do we have rectifier diodes (e.g. 1N4xxx, 1N54xx) with different voltage ratings? Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? 73, Mike, KK6GM __________________________________________________ _______ $$$ -- Bill, W7TI Yep. And I'd wager if one did breakdown tests on a variety of diodes many would show the same specs regardless of their different markings. Another pet peeve- Several times I've seen failure of low voltage capacitors which were run too close to their ratings for comfort, IMO. Like 16 vdc rated on a 13.8 DC line in mobile gear. Spikes are sure to take 'em out eventually, it would seem. Why designers do that I've never understood, and I never replace them as rated, but use 25 or 30 volt caps. Never had a problem from doing that, and no repeats. I remember years ago troubleshooting a dead board in an Atlas 210 transciever that had a shorted - leaky 16 volt rated electrolytic across a 13.8 dc line on the board. But it still had enough internal resistance that it didn't smoke anything, just killed the operation of the board. I cussed the (unknown) designer of that thing for awhile! /:-D)) Dick, Electrolytics should be run near their rated voltage to "form" properly. The spikes should be taken out by a parallel 100nF cap, or clipped by a zener. Rob |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on
the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? ================================= Because somebody like you would complain about no 2kv diodes being available. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on
the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? ================================= Because somebody like you would complain about no 2kv diodes being available. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ...
Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? ================================= Because somebody like you would complain about no 2kv diodes being available. Like me in what way? Curious? Uninformed? Ignorant? Whipped with extension cords as a child? Raised by circus performers? Eats mayonnaise out of the jar when depressed? Come to think of it, why the heck *aren't* there any 2kv diodes available?! And how come I can't buy air-variables for a buck down at the corner electronics store?! 73, Mike, KK6GM |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ...
Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? ================================= Because somebody like you would complain about no 2kv diodes being available. Like me in what way? Curious? Uninformed? Ignorant? Whipped with extension cords as a child? Raised by circus performers? Eats mayonnaise out of the jar when depressed? Come to think of it, why the heck *aren't* there any 2kv diodes available?! And how come I can't buy air-variables for a buck down at the corner electronics store?! 73, Mike, KK6GM |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like me in what way? Curious? Uninformed? Ignorant? Whipped with
extension cords as a child? Raised by circus performers? Eats mayonnaise out of the jar when depressed? ===================================== Mike, you and I have much in common. I really do sympathise. Pleased to make your acquaintance. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
physical/intuitive understanding of RL/RC time constants? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |