![]() |
"donut" wrote in message --SNIP-- 1. Change the channel the walkie talkies operate on, or 2. Replace them with walkie talkies using another band. I believe there are walkies talkies that also operate around 49 MHz. FWIW, the cost of FRS radios has come down to the level of kid's walkie talkies. I recently bought a pair of Uniden FRS radios at WalMart for about $17 / pair. 27 MHz walkie talkies are still around $10 a pair. I gave 'em to my kids so they can keep in touch around the neighborhood..... RaOuL |
"donut" wrote in message --SNIP-- 1. Change the channel the walkie talkies operate on, or 2. Replace them with walkie talkies using another band. I believe there are walkies talkies that also operate around 49 MHz. FWIW, the cost of FRS radios has come down to the level of kid's walkie talkies. I recently bought a pair of Uniden FRS radios at WalMart for about $17 / pair. 27 MHz walkie talkies are still around $10 a pair. I gave 'em to my kids so they can keep in touch around the neighborhood..... RaOuL |
"donut" wrote in message ... (Limitedselection) wrote in : I hardly think this would be a problem. For one, you'd need an antenna radiating a large proportion of skywave. Second, the CB bands are loaded with all kinds of open carriers, whistlers, music players, etc. so your tiny part in this would be unlikely to harm anyone. You cannot control whether an antenna radiates a skywave or a groundwave. Even with controlling the takeoff angle, you will still get some radiation in other directions which means you will get some skywave propagation anyway. Due to its frequency, groundwave on CB is not a useful propagation mode. 27mhz is high enough in frequency that it does not want to follow the curvature of the earth. It propagates mainly by "line of sight" (i.e. straight line) and/or skywave (i.e. skip). Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"donut" wrote in message ... (Limitedselection) wrote in : I hardly think this would be a problem. For one, you'd need an antenna radiating a large proportion of skywave. Second, the CB bands are loaded with all kinds of open carriers, whistlers, music players, etc. so your tiny part in this would be unlikely to harm anyone. You cannot control whether an antenna radiates a skywave or a groundwave. Even with controlling the takeoff angle, you will still get some radiation in other directions which means you will get some skywave propagation anyway. Due to its frequency, groundwave on CB is not a useful propagation mode. 27mhz is high enough in frequency that it does not want to follow the curvature of the earth. It propagates mainly by "line of sight" (i.e. straight line) and/or skywave (i.e. skip). Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"donut" wrote in message ... (Limitedselection) wrote in : I wouldn't be worried about thelegal issues if skywave was not an issue. But unfortunately it looks like with skywave any signal no matter how small can be heard world-wide. This is ridiculous. Try talking skip even on a car CB putting out legal power. It ain't gonna happen. Happens all the time when the sunspot cycle is favorable. Beside, the solar cycle is on it's downward spiral, and skip openings on 29 MHz are going to become few and far between and the cycle deepens. If your local CBer is primarily a "skip" talker, that in itself might take him out. Unfortunately the CB operator will probably think the solution is more power. When he gets an occasional E skip propagation, he'll think he was correct. His use of excessive power will then aggravate the situation. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"donut" wrote in message ... (Limitedselection) wrote in : I wouldn't be worried about thelegal issues if skywave was not an issue. But unfortunately it looks like with skywave any signal no matter how small can be heard world-wide. This is ridiculous. Try talking skip even on a car CB putting out legal power. It ain't gonna happen. Happens all the time when the sunspot cycle is favorable. Beside, the solar cycle is on it's downward spiral, and skip openings on 29 MHz are going to become few and far between and the cycle deepens. If your local CBer is primarily a "skip" talker, that in itself might take him out. Unfortunately the CB operator will probably think the solution is more power. When he gets an occasional E skip propagation, he'll think he was correct. His use of excessive power will then aggravate the situation. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Now, he actually has fun frustrating the offending CB'er.
That's great. So now your friend has become a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. That makes him no better than the guy he's compaining about. |
Now, he actually has fun frustrating the offending CB'er.
That's great. So now your friend has become a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. That makes him no better than the guy he's compaining about. |
Why not get a pair of Motorola frs radio set (pair) at local store,
I just picked up a pair for $ 25 and a mail in rebate for $ 15 so low cost, plus these are on uhf frequencies, no cb frequencies and low power. Less expensive then trying to block the nasty guy on the cb. jimboz Limitedselection wrote: Roy, Thanks - Mike posted about sky waves (I was unaware of), so even a very low power device centrally located in my property would apparently be heard world-wide - which is NOT what I want. Actually, I did want to jam the reception of the existing CB signals on my property (at least in and around the house). One of my neighbors uses rather 'salty' language and the local kids use some walkie talkies around the house - I fugured that jamming the outside signals would still allow the kids to talk due to their close proximity. Thanks again. From: Roy Lewallen There's no way to make a signal stop at your property line, short of putting a perfect shield around your property. And if you did that, you wouldn't be bothered by your neighbor's CB anyway. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com