Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC), Mike Andrews wrote:
In (rec.radio.amateur.homebrew), phil hunt wrote: Modern crypto is good enough to withstand all cryptanalytic attacks. That's a great idea, and I suspect tthat you're right in the general case. But a modern cryptosystem, badly implemented, will have all manner of vulnerabilities -- most of which are not particularly obvious. Absolutely. Remember the competition for the successor to DES as the standard crypto algorithm? That was *quite* interesting. What was interesting about it? -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419  October 22, 2004 | Dx | |||
F6FBB to Internet email? | Digital | |||
F6FBB to Internet email? | Digital | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment |