Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1502151330260.12310@darkstar. example.org... Since it was Armstrong's method, and he was interested in wide deviation, the amplitude would have been removed by the multipliers to get it up to the desired signal frequency. Michael Thanks for this historical information I didn' knew And in those times the varicap diode was a dream so it was very clever. It seems to me that adjusting levels of the carrier and sidebands allows quite wide phase shifts So may be frequency multiplication was not imperative. A C class PA is quite good at removing AM But this is only by figuring things as rotating vectors as I am too poor a mathematician to be affirmative. :-) Laurent .. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Homebuilt NBFM Receiver | Homebrew | |||
NBFM transceiver @2.4GHz | Antenna | |||
FS: Collins calibrators and NBFM | Boatanchors | |||
FS: 148C-1 NBFM adapter | Boatanchors | |||
NBFM from DDS chip | Homebrew |