Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read an article about WWVB reception for a frequency standard that made
use of a zero crossing detector to detect the 60 KHz signal. His point was that many detection schemes can get a false count now and then due to the 10 dB drop in signal strength that WWVB uses to encode the time information. Apparently, the zero crossings are quite stable regardless of the amplitude change. For a system to recover the time information, I'd be inclined to simply amplify the incoming and then use a diode detector of some sort. Well, that and a SLOW AGC system... I do not think it would need anything as complex as a synchronous detector since any changes in the propogation of 60 KHz is very slow. Admitted, the occasional noise burst may result in a false pulse now and then. Since you are likely to feed the signal into a computer of some sort to decode the pulses to a time signal, you can add some programming to handle the occasional false pulse. Jim Pennell N6BIU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WWVB - date? | Equipment | |||
WWVB - date? | Equipment | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Digital | |||
WWVB decoder circuit | Boatanchors | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna |