LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old October 11th 03, 02:03 AM
Jim Pennell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I read an article about WWVB reception for a frequency standard that made
use of a zero crossing detector to detect the 60 KHz signal.

His point was that many detection schemes can get a false count now and
then due to the 10 dB drop in signal strength that WWVB uses to encode the
time information.

Apparently, the zero crossings are quite stable regardless of the
amplitude change.

For a system to recover the time information, I'd be inclined to simply
amplify the incoming and then use a diode detector of some sort. Well, that
and a SLOW AGC system...

I do not think it would need anything as complex as a synchronous
detector since any changes in the propogation of 60 KHz is very slow.
Admitted, the occasional noise burst may result in a false pulse now and
then.

Since you are likely to feed the signal into a computer of some sort to
decode the pulses to a time signal, you can add some programming to handle
the occasional false pulse.



Jim Pennell
N6BIU




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WWVB - date? Allodoxaphobia Equipment 14 July 11th 04 04:18 AM
WWVB - date? Allodoxaphobia Equipment 0 July 10th 04 09:44 PM
WWVB decoder circuit [email protected] Digital 1 May 28th 04 04:23 AM
WWVB decoder circuit Mike Knudsen Boatanchors 3 March 10th 04 04:44 AM
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna David Kao Antenna 0 January 20th 04 01:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017