Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi chaps, Heading sums it up. I'm using a 74HC04 to 'square-off' a sine wave, but it's causing a fair amount of ringing on the output signal's highs and lows which appears to be finding its way through to the eventual final stage. How do I best eliminate (or at least drastically reduce) this nuisance? The square wave frequency is 8Mhz., btw. Thanks, p. -- "Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and produced by a two bit company." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Burridge wrote:
Hi chaps, Heading sums it up. I'm using a 74HC04 to 'square-off' a sine wave, but it's causing a fair amount of ringing on the output signal's highs and lows which appears to be finding its way through to the eventual final stage. How do I best eliminate (or at least drastically reduce) this nuisance? The square wave frequency is 8Mhz., btw. Thanks, p. If you put a low inductance termination resistance right at the pin with no wire and a low inductance bypass cap at the power supply and properly introduce the signal to a scope, is the ringing still there? If it ain't, the chip ain't causing it. Does the output ring with a square wave input? Ringing is often more about the interconnect than the chip...often...not always... Oscillation, which can look like ringing is often about the input drive for low dv/dt inputs. Observed ringing, as opposed to Actual ringing can also be all about measurement technique. Can you be more numerical about "fair amount"? Amplitude and frequency of the ring? Getting rid depends on how much you got and how much you can stand and what you're driving. mike -- Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below. laptops and parts Test Equipment 4in/400Wout ham linear amp. Honda CB-125S 400cc Dirt Bike 2003 miles $550 Police Scanner, Color LCD overhead projector Tek 2465 $800, ham radio, 30pS pulser Tektronix Concept Books, spot welding head... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:28:06 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote: Hi chaps, Heading sums it up. I'm using a 74HC04 to 'square-off' a sine wave, but it's causing a fair amount of ringing on the output signal's highs and lows which appears to be finding its way through to the eventual final stage. How do I best eliminate (or at least drastically reduce) this nuisance? The square wave frequency is 8Mhz., btw. Thanks, p. Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. d _____________________________ http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:47:40 +0100, Don Pearce
wrote: Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. Thanks Don. I'll try that suggestion. I've read Mike's reply but I think he's pretty much saying the same thing as you. I've ended up with a decoupling cap that straddles diagonally over the top of the IC. For some reason, on this chip, the supply and gnd pins are on opposite corners, which is a nuisance, so the cap's leads are longer than I'd have liked. I suppose this sort of situation doesn't help? -- "Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and produced by a two bit company." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:34:45 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:47:40 +0100, Don Pearce wrote: Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. Thanks Don. I'll try that suggestion. I've read Mike's reply but I think he's pretty much saying the same thing as you. I've ended up with a decoupling cap that straddles diagonally over the top of the IC. For some reason, on this chip, the supply and gnd pins are on opposite corners, which is a nuisance, so the cap's leads are longer than I'd have liked. I suppose this sort of situation doesn't help? I was once called down to the production testing by a newly hired tech with a similar complaint of excessive ringing. Turned out that the scope was grounded to the circuit by a separate banana lead. The scope probe ground was removed "because it was is not convenient" although there were plenty of local ground point provided on the board. There was some residual ringing in his ears afterwards. -- Regards, Boris Mohar Got Knock? - see: Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs http://www3.sympatico.ca/borism/ Aurora, Ontario |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:34:45 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:47:40 +0100, Don Pearce wrote: Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. Thanks Don. I'll try that suggestion. I've read Mike's reply but I think he's pretty much saying the same thing as you. I've ended up with a decoupling cap that straddles diagonally over the top of the IC. For some reason, on this chip, the supply and gnd pins are on opposite corners, which is a nuisance, so the cap's leads are longer than I'd have liked. I suppose this sort of situation doesn't help? I was once called down to the production testing by a newly hired tech with a similar complaint of excessive ringing. Turned out that the scope was grounded to the circuit by a separate banana lead. The scope probe ground was removed "because it was is not convenient" although there were plenty of local ground point provided on the board. There was some residual ringing in his ears afterwards. -- Regards, Boris Mohar Got Knock? - see: Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs http://www3.sympatico.ca/borism/ Aurora, Ontario |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:47:40 +0100, Don Pearce wrote: Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. Thanks Don. I'll try that suggestion. I've read Mike's reply but I think he's pretty much saying the same thing as you. I've ended up with a decoupling cap that straddles diagonally over the top of the IC. For some reason, on this chip, the supply and gnd pins are on opposite corners, which is a nuisance, so the cap's leads are longer than I'd have liked. I suppose this sort of situation doesn't help? -- "Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and produced by a two bit company." The 'HC and 'AC families (at least the simpler parts) can be made to give _extremely_ clean square wave outputs, but as Don and Mike say, you have to be careful. The decoupling cap you mention above sounds like a leaded part, with a very substantial amount of lead inductance when mounted like that. For good results, ideally you would have planes for power and ground on adjacent layers in the PCB under the chip. That allows you to put the decoupler at either end of the chip, and still retain low inductance. Adjacent planes also acts as a small but very good at HF capacitor. Boris makes a good point about the size of the loop between probe tip and ground. You can get little socket adapters which you solder to the board to minimise this. Regards Ian |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:47:40 +0100, Don Pearce wrote: Layout, layout and layout. Decouplers close to chips, short ground leads. Also be quite certain that the ringing is really there. Ditch the ground lead from the scope probe and make a very short one by wrapping stiff wire round the earth ring at the end of the probe and leaving a piece as long as the probe tip sticking out. Get up close to the chip signal and ground pins and see if the ringing is gone. Thanks Don. I'll try that suggestion. I've read Mike's reply but I think he's pretty much saying the same thing as you. I've ended up with a decoupling cap that straddles diagonally over the top of the IC. For some reason, on this chip, the supply and gnd pins are on opposite corners, which is a nuisance, so the cap's leads are longer than I'd have liked. I suppose this sort of situation doesn't help? -- "Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and produced by a two bit company." The 'HC and 'AC families (at least the simpler parts) can be made to give _extremely_ clean square wave outputs, but as Don and Mike say, you have to be careful. The decoupling cap you mention above sounds like a leaded part, with a very substantial amount of lead inductance when mounted like that. For good results, ideally you would have planes for power and ground on adjacent layers in the PCB under the chip. That allows you to put the decoupler at either end of the chip, and still retain low inductance. Adjacent planes also acts as a small but very good at HF capacitor. Boris makes a good point about the size of the loop between probe tip and ground. You can get little socket adapters which you solder to the board to minimise this. Regards Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Boonton Measurements Model 72 Square Wave Generator | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Boonton Measurements Model 72 Square Wave Generator | Boatanchors | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |