Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred McKenzie wrote:
Perhaps that is what I'm remembering. Now, if you use a filter to eliminate the other sideband, the higher frequency components and the carrier, don't you have a nearly identical remainder? At that point I don't think you could tell the difference since there's no longer any local phase reference (i.e., the carrier) to compare with. I suppose this is why your SSB-AM rig is able to (somewhat) receive low frequency (and thereby presumably narrowband) FM broadcasts; this is what you were saying in your last post, correct? I think we are in agreement that you can't recover FM modulation with just an envelope detector Yes, at least you can't recover a signal that directly corresponds to what you transmitted. It does appear that you can recover the signal's square, however, so this approach might be useful for, e.g., remote command transmissions. (But probably just for the novelty of having said you did it... since it's probably not much harder to build the slope detector you describe!) ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
6L6 single tube transmitter | Boatanchors | |||
6L6 single tube transmitter | Boatanchors | |||
Single ground | Antenna | |||
Need single SP-352 Display (Heathkit) pull is fine | Boatanchors | |||
WTB single 'half-speed' 572B | Boatanchors |