Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 08:48 PM
Ashhar Farhan
 
Posts: n/a
Default A simple dual-band SSB transceiver

I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 11:04 PM
PJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks very interesting. You have a lot of ambition.

Phil

"Ashhar Farhan" wrote in message
om...
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan



  #3   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 11:04 PM
PJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks very interesting. You have a lot of ambition.

Phil

"Ashhar Farhan" wrote in message
om...
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan



  #4   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 11:56 PM
Roger Leone
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks very much. It is an interesting transceiver and the schematic is
very well done.

Roger K6XQ


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 11:56 PM
Roger Leone
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks very much. It is an interesting transceiver and the schematic is
very well done.

Roger K6XQ




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 25th 03, 06:31 AM
richard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It looks very interesting - great results with minimal resources
Thanks very much
Is your linear amp broadband?
How are you going on the direct conversion spectrum analyser idea?

Richard


Ashhar Farhan wrote:
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan


  #7   Report Post  
Old October 25th 03, 06:31 AM
richard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It looks very interesting - great results with minimal resources
Thanks very much
Is your linear amp broadband?
How are you going on the direct conversion spectrum analyser idea?

Richard


Ashhar Farhan wrote:
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan


  #8   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 09:28 PM
John R. Strohm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I see an obvious problem in the schematic.

You show two separate transformers labelled T5. One is clearly a trifilar
device, in your two-diode balanced mixer. The other is clearly a bifilar
device, coupling output from the IRF510 final into the output filter. You
probably want to fix that nomenclature, and add data for the RF output
transformer.

Also, I'm curious. Why did you use 2N3866 everywhere, instead of, say,
PN2222A (plastic 2N2222A)?

"Ashhar Farhan" wrote in message
om...
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan



  #9   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 09:28 PM
John R. Strohm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I see an obvious problem in the schematic.

You show two separate transformers labelled T5. One is clearly a trifilar
device, in your two-diode balanced mixer. The other is clearly a bifilar
device, coupling output from the IRF510 final into the output filter. You
probably want to fix that nomenclature, and add data for the RF output
transformer.

Also, I'm curious. Why did you use 2N3866 everywhere, instead of, say,
PN2222A (plastic 2N2222A)?

"Ashhar Farhan" wrote in message
om...
I have been working on an SSB transciever for the last two months, it
finally went on-air at VU2PEP a fortnight ago. We are quite happy with
the performance. A number of on-air contacts have asked for the
details.

Here is the link:
http://farhan.net.co.nr

I would love to have feedback from you all. I have hastily put the
detaits together, I might have left something out. I am not sure. This
is the first time I am putting any of my radio efforts on the Web.
comments are welcome.

- farhan



  #10   Report Post  
Old October 28th 03, 06:58 AM
Ashhar Farhan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John R. Strohm" wrote in message ...
I see an obvious problem in the schematic.

You show two separate transformers labelled T5. One is clearly a trifilar
device, in your two-diode balanced mixer. The other is clearly a bifilar
device, coupling output from the IRF510 final into the output filter. You
probably want to fix that nomenclature, and add data for the RF output
transformer.

Also, I'm curious. Why did you use 2N3866 everywhere, instead of, say,
PN2222A (plastic 2N2222A)?


john and others -

tnx for the corrections. i also forgot to put the half-wave filter's
specs and couple of other subtle typos. i am trying to assemble the
second prototype (the one in the picture) refering to just the
schematic on the web, to check if things are proper. i will post the
corrections soon.

what i did discover about 2n3866 vs. 2n2222 was this: the 2n2222 is
mostly used in low frequency switching applications in india.
therefore, slimy manufacturers change the markings on other lower
frequency transistors and palm them off as 2n2222. the BF194s that i
have used extensively is a close plastic cousin of 2n2222 that is used
as self-oscillating mixer for shortwave radios in india. It does a
reasonable job at HF frequencies if you are not too particular about
performance.

The 2n3866 is used in india by the cable TV industry for boosting the
line signals. We ordinarily get about 70 channels through the cable
(at $3 per month, including HBO/Discovery etc.). The 2n3866 has to
keep intermod to a minimum. therefore, we get fairly good quality
transistors as far as '3866 is concerned.

in anycase, you will see that the post mix (which should have used a
220R as the emitter bias resistor instead of the wrongly shown 560)
needs to be a large signal transistor. I tried with a 2N918 first, as
the post-mix and noted an immediate increase in the background hiss
(compared to the 3866). I tried the BF194/5 and found it was easily
overloading from the computer noise (i am using a PC-based scope). I
tried also a BD139 as the post-mix(a 15 watt hifi audio beast with Ft
of 150 MHz) and found it to be very noisy.

The circuit uses feedback and degeneration quite extensively, so I
urge builders to try different transistors. Most should work, some
better than the others. You can also try paralleling two 2n2222 with
separate emiiter bias (diving the current in half between them) for
the driver feeding the IRF510.

also, i am sort of giving up the idea of making the txcvr multi-band.
the bandswitch is a pain. and the transciever costs about $10 in parts
here in india, so i might as well build one for each band upto 21MHz.

oh, btw, the local spares shops say that the IRF511 has been
discontinued. is it true?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS Alinco DR-605TQ Dual Band Transceiver Charlie Hugg Equipment 0 December 17th 04 03:36 AM
FS Alinco DR-605TQ Dual Band Transceiver Charlie Hugg Equipment 0 December 17th 04 03:36 AM
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 3 November 1st 04 04:31 AM
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 0 November 1st 04 04:26 AM
FS: Yaesu FT-8500 VHF/UHF Dual Band FM Transceiver David Black Equipment 0 November 1st 04 04:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017