Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whichever way you go, be sure to put a lightning arrestor on the lead in.
David Forsyth wrote: In the interest of my recent tinkerings with radios (both antique and homebrew), I have put up an 80 foot straight wire antenna above the house. It sits about 35 feet up from, and horizontal to, the ground. I am using a lead in from one end made of insulated stranded copper wire (basically old speaker cable, about 18 guage I think). Right now, the lead-in wire comes down from the end of the antenna closest to the sun porch, and in through the storm window via a well-insulated bushing. Due to the location of this lead-in, this is the spot wherre I have been doing most of the tinkering with the radios. I also have a copper pipe ground rod in a nearby location so as to have as short a path to ground as possible.) It seems to work OK for now but I would ideally like to run the lead-in into my basement where my workshop is. I read somewhere (I think it might have been in reference to crystal sets) that you can use coax for an AM lead-in. Would this be better for a longer/more convoluted lead-in? Would I use the braded shield as the ground connection or would I run a separate ground back to my copper rod outside? What type of coax would be best for this sort of thing? I am interested in receiving both broadcast and shortwave. Any info on this matter would be most appreciated. thanks in advance, Dave -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny." -F.Z. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the antenna is the typical end-fed wire then the impedance will be
very high. Most AM radios have a high impedance input designed to match a random wire like that. If you use coax, the capacitance of the coax (center conductor to shield) will essentially short most of the signal to ground and little will get to the receiver. If you've ever opened up the coax used on car radios you'll find that it is a special high impedance coax. A small wire fits loosly thru an insulated tube with the shield around the outside. This keeps a relatively large spacing between the center conductor and the shield in order to minimize capacitance. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
There is no simple answer to your problem as the impedances and frequency range involved are too great. However, as you are not intending to use the antenna to transmit with, take a look at this site and do a search on "LONG WIRE BALUN". http://www.maplin.co.uk/ If you are in the U.S. I am sure that there will be an equivalent item around somewhere. It is even possible that there is a design for one of these out on the net. The device is mis-named really and should be called something like an UNUN. Of course it is a kludge but what the hell as it should be better than a single wire or coax feed from your basement. Cheers - Joe, G3LLV |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all who responded thus far (and sorry to be such a wellspring of
newbie questons). Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! I was aware that one should install such a device at the time I put up the antenna, but I didn't have one handy, nor did I feel the need to invest in one. I was thinking that in the late fall/winter we really don't get any lightning here (north-east PA) and therefore I wouldn't really need a lightning arrestor until the Spring. I'm sure I'm probably wrong on this, though, as it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. I guess it would be helpful to include some more specifics about what radios Im trying to feed with this antenna. Thus far, I have accumulated an A****er Kent "big box" Model 20, an A****er Kent 55-C (chassis only), an RCA Radiola 18, and a homebrew regen. This is my latest project. It uses a '36 screen grid tube as detector and a 6F8G as dual-stage audio driving a loudspeaker through an overly large Hammond OPT. So far I've only wound a coil for BC band and this thing works amazingly well. I plan on making some smaller coils for short wave (hopefully the solar storm stuff wont be long in staying). I also have future plans for a Grigsby-Grunow that was given to me to fix up, but it's on the distant horizon as of yet. So far nobody has complained about the large pile of radio-related crap in the sun porch, but Im sure it's a matter of time. I will probably have to route the antenna lead-in through a wall or two and around some bends and twists to get it into the workshop in the basement. I guess I was assuming I should use coax for this, but apparently not, from what everyone here is saying. I'm not as concerned about noise as I am about possible signal loss. Is this something to even be concerned about with a plain old insulated stranded wire lead-in routed through walls and such? I'm still new at this RF stuff (being a relatively recent convert from the realm of "AF"), so please bear with me, and thanks for all the helpful tips and suggestions! Dave |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After doing a lot of reading on the web about long wires, short wires,
inverted L's, impedance matching, baluns, ununs, onions, fundip, and who knows what else... I was thinking (run for cover please) Couldn't one simply use a small active device to buffer the straight wire antenna at the end where it tethers to Ye Olde Oak tree or whatever it's tied to? I was thinking you could even make it powered with a small gel cell or something and a solar cell to power it. Some sort of wide-band amplifier that would have a suitably high input impedance to accomodate the higher and varying impedance of the wire over the desired frequency range, and yet having a fixed 75 or 50 ohm output impedance to drive the coax that runs back to the house. Then you could use a transformer in the house at the receiver if it's the type that wants to be fed from a high-impedance. I would think this would get around the problem of an impedance matching transformer mismatching the antenna on frequncies where the antenna impedance drops significantly. Also it could provide perhaps some minimal gain to boot. Some of those commercial impedance matching transformers sell for over $50 US. So I would think a small buffer amp might not be too cost-ineffective. Dave |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Forsyth wrote:
After doing a lot of reading on the web about long wires, short wires, inverted L's, impedance matching, baluns, ununs, onions, fundip, and who knows what else... I was thinking (run for cover please) Couldn't one simply use a small active device to buffer the straight wire antenna at the end where it tethers to Ye Olde Oak tree or whatever it's tied to? I was thinking you could even make it powered with a small gel cell or something and a solar cell to power it. Some sort of wide-band amplifier that would have a suitably high input impedance to accomodate the higher and varying impedance of the wire over the desired frequency range, and yet having a fixed 75 or 50 ohm output impedance to drive the coax that runs back to the house. Then you could use a transformer in the house at the receiver if it's the type that wants to be fed from a high-impedance. I would think this would get around the problem of an impedance matching transformer mismatching the antenna on frequncies where the antenna impedance drops significantly. Also it could provide perhaps some minimal gain to boot. Some of those commercial impedance matching transformers sell for over $50 US. So I would think a small buffer amp might not be too cost-ineffective. Dave If you want to put a preamp near the antenna, you can run a DC voltage up the coax by using RF chokes in the DC lines at both ends to isolate the RF, and series coupling capacitors to block the DC. That is how LNA/B/Cs are powered on most Sat TV receivers, and I have used it at 60 KHz, as well. You could use a Minicircuits chip that cost about $1.00 by adding a couple caps, a coil and a resistor. Their ERA or MAR series would do a good job, and the part is cheap enough that you can afford to replace it when lightning takes out your preamp. I have some rejected blank surface mount PC boards that will work for the part (They were laid out wrong, and engineering had to eat the cost). You can also do dead bug, or even use the old Vector Perfboard pins or standoffs and build it point to point. They do need a ground plane, but are quite stable. These parts have a 50 ohm output, so they will match either 50 or 75 ohm coax with little problems. You might need a low pass filter to remove out of band noise and signals to prevent overload, or if you want to have real fun built a remote tuner at the preamp. -- Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Forsyth wrote:
After doing a lot of reading on the web about long wires, short wires, inverted L's, impedance matching, baluns, ununs, onions, fundip, and who knows what else... I was thinking (run for cover please) Couldn't one simply use a small active device to buffer the straight wire antenna at the end where it tethers to Ye Olde Oak tree or whatever it's tied to? I was thinking you could even make it powered with a small gel cell or something and a solar cell to power it. Some sort of wide-band amplifier that would have a suitably high input impedance to accomodate the higher and varying impedance of the wire over the desired frequency range, and yet having a fixed 75 or 50 ohm output impedance to drive the coax that runs back to the house. Then you could use a transformer in the house at the receiver if it's the type that wants to be fed from a high-impedance. I would think this would get around the problem of an impedance matching transformer mismatching the antenna on frequncies where the antenna impedance drops significantly. Also it could provide perhaps some minimal gain to boot. Some of those commercial impedance matching transformers sell for over $50 US. So I would think a small buffer amp might not be too cost-ineffective. Dave If you want to put a preamp near the antenna, you can run a DC voltage up the coax by using RF chokes in the DC lines at both ends to isolate the RF, and series coupling capacitors to block the DC. That is how LNA/B/Cs are powered on most Sat TV receivers, and I have used it at 60 KHz, as well. You could use a Minicircuits chip that cost about $1.00 by adding a couple caps, a coil and a resistor. Their ERA or MAR series would do a good job, and the part is cheap enough that you can afford to replace it when lightning takes out your preamp. I have some rejected blank surface mount PC boards that will work for the part (They were laid out wrong, and engineering had to eat the cost). You can also do dead bug, or even use the old Vector Perfboard pins or standoffs and build it point to point. They do need a ground plane, but are quite stable. These parts have a 50 ohm output, so they will match either 50 or 75 ohm coax with little problems. You might need a low pass filter to remove out of band noise and signals to prevent overload, or if you want to have real fun built a remote tuner at the preamp. -- Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
There is no simple answer to your problem as the impedances and frequency range involved are too great. However, as you are not intending to use the antenna to transmit with, take a look at this site and do a search on "LONG WIRE BALUN". http://www.maplin.co.uk/ If you are in the U.S. I am sure that there will be an equivalent item around somewhere. It is even possible that there is a design for one of these out on the net. The device is mis-named really and should be called something like an UNUN. Of course it is a kludge but what the hell as it should be better than a single wire or coax feed from your basement. Cheers - Joe, G3LLV |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After doing a lot of reading on the web about long wires, short wires,
inverted L's, impedance matching, baluns, ununs, onions, fundip, and who knows what else... I was thinking (run for cover please) Couldn't one simply use a small active device to buffer the straight wire antenna at the end where it tethers to Ye Olde Oak tree or whatever it's tied to? I was thinking you could even make it powered with a small gel cell or something and a solar cell to power it. Some sort of wide-band amplifier that would have a suitably high input impedance to accomodate the higher and varying impedance of the wire over the desired frequency range, and yet having a fixed 75 or 50 ohm output impedance to drive the coax that runs back to the house. Then you could use a transformer in the house at the receiver if it's the type that wants to be fed from a high-impedance. I would think this would get around the problem of an impedance matching transformer mismatching the antenna on frequncies where the antenna impedance drops significantly. Also it could provide perhaps some minimal gain to boot. Some of those commercial impedance matching transformers sell for over $50 US. So I would think a small buffer amp might not be too cost-ineffective. Dave |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Forsyth" wrote in message ...
In the interest of my recent tinkerings with radios (both antique and homebrew), I have put up an 80 foot straight wire antenna above the house. It sits about 35 feet up from, and horizontal to, the ground. I am using a lead in from one end made of insulated stranded copper wire (basically old speaker cable, about 18 guage I think). Right now, the lead-in wire comes down from the end of the antenna closest to the sun porch, and in through the storm window via a well-insulated bushing. Due to the location of this lead-in, this is the spot wherre I have been doing most of the tinkering with the radios. I also have a copper pipe ground rod in a nearby location so as to have as short a path to ground as possible.) It seems to work OK for now but I would ideally like to run the lead-in into my basement where my workshop is. I read somewhere (I think it might have been in reference to crystal sets) that you can use coax for an AM lead-in. Would this be better for a longer/more convoluted lead-in? Would I use the braded shield as the ground connection or would I run a separate ground back to my copper rod outside? What type of coax would be best for this sort of thing? I am interested in receiving both broadcast and shortwave. Any info on this matter would be most appreciated. thanks in advance, Dave Al Klase figured that our several years ago: http://www.webex.net/~skywaves/ANTENNA/antsys.htm Jiri Placek Boyertown, PA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |