Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:40:59 +0000 (UTC), Joe McElvenney
wrote: Hi, Have a look at the 74HCT40103 on the Philips site. Although the output is asymmetric, it will divide by any number between 2 and 255. Cheers - Joe Thanks for the suggestion, I've used CMOS for almost 30 years and only use TTL when it is no other solution, one such device is with the 7493 as OH3LWR mention (believe it could divided by some strange factor, too). problem is that I have hundreds of standard CMOS devices and they usually (except Philips devices) goes near 10MHz. The reason for choosing a down counter is to avoid asymmetrical output signal which might upset the counter if the oscillatorboard has some distance from the old dividers, but is still some 7490's left in the chain. 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/29a.htm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:40:59 +0000 (UTC), Joe McElvenney
wrote: Hi, Have a look at the 74HCT40103 on the Philips site. Although the output is asymmetric, it will divide by any number between 2 and 255. Cheers - Joe Thanks for the suggestion, I've used CMOS for almost 30 years and only use TTL when it is no other solution, one such device is with the 7493 as OH3LWR mention (believe it could divided by some strange factor, too). problem is that I have hundreds of standard CMOS devices and they usually (except Philips devices) goes near 10MHz. The reason for choosing a down counter is to avoid asymmetrical output signal which might upset the counter if the oscillatorboard has some distance from the old dividers, but is still some 7490's left in the chain. 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/29a.htm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
J M Noeding wrote:
Hi for my quite unstable counters I've got some 0.1ppm 9.6MHz VCXO's (guaranteed over temperature range -20...+20°C), the problem is that the original XO is 1MHz with 7490 divider, and now I need a divide by 96 downcounter. The VCXO drives a 74LS14, so it shouldn't be any fan out problem, but I am not aware what is the readily available divider to choose. The counter is mentioned on http://home.online.no/~la8ak/m21.htm , but it is Norwegian text hpe 2 hr fm u 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/d.htm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) Search through Goggle groups in sci.electronics.design for a divide by 3 counter, and follow it with five stages of divide by 2 counters. 96/3 = 32 32/2 = 16 16/2 = 8 8/2 = 4 4/2 = 2 2/2 = 1 You want the odd counter somewhere before the final stage to maintain a 50% duty cycle. -- Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "J M Noeding" wrote in message ... for my quite unstable counters I've got some 0.1ppm 9.6MHz VCXO's (guaranteed over temperature range -20...+20°C), the problem is that the original XO is 1MHz with 7490 divider, and now I need a divide by 96 downcounter. The VCXO drives a 74LS14, so it shouldn't be any fan out problem, but I am not aware what is the readily available divider to choose. The counter is mentioned on http://home.online.no/~la8ak/m21.htm , but it is Norwegian text The 74HC4059 (or 74HCT4059) should do the trick. It may be a bit hard to find, but will divide by any number from 3 to 16384. It is logically the same as the RCA CD4059, but I don't think the old RCA part will work at your frequency. I can't find my data book right now. 73 de bob w3otc |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "J M Noeding" wrote in message ... for my quite unstable counters I've got some 0.1ppm 9.6MHz VCXO's (guaranteed over temperature range -20...+20°C), the problem is that the original XO is 1MHz with 7490 divider, and now I need a divide by 96 downcounter. The VCXO drives a 74LS14, so it shouldn't be any fan out problem, but I am not aware what is the readily available divider to choose. The counter is mentioned on http://home.online.no/~la8ak/m21.htm , but it is Norwegian text Oops, I may be wrong about the maximum division ratio of the 4059, but it is certainly as large as 4 decimal digits (not binary). Again, I can't find my data book right now. 73 de bob w3otc |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Have a look at the 74HCT40103 on the Philips site. Although the output is asymmetric, it will divide by any number between 2 and 255. Cheers - Joe |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , wrote:
Hi for my quite unstable counters I've got some 0.1ppm 9.6MHz VCXO's (guaranteed over temperature range -20...+20°C), the problem is that the original XO is 1MHz with 7490 divider, and now I need a divide by 96 downcounter. The VCXO drives a 74LS14, so it shouldn't be any fan out problem, but I am not aware what is the readily available divider to choose. The counter is mentioned on http://home.online.no/~la8ak/m21.htm , but it is Norwegian text hpe 2 hr fm u 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/d.htm You can make a ÷3 out of a couple of J-K flip-flops, then use that to clock a 5 stage binary counter. That way you get 50% duty cycle square waves at 1.6 MHz, 800 kHz, etc. all the way down. Just a suggestion -- there are many other ways. Dr. G. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , wrote:
Hi for my quite unstable counters I've got some 0.1ppm 9.6MHz VCXO's (guaranteed over temperature range -20...+20°C), the problem is that the original XO is 1MHz with 7490 divider, and now I need a divide by 96 downcounter. The VCXO drives a 74LS14, so it shouldn't be any fan out problem, but I am not aware what is the readily available divider to choose. The counter is mentioned on http://home.online.no/~la8ak/m21.htm , but it is Norwegian text hpe 2 hr fm u 73 Jan-Martin, LA8AK http://home.online.no/~la8ak/d.htm You can make a ÷3 out of a couple of J-K flip-flops, then use that to clock a 5 stage binary counter. That way you get 50% duty cycle square waves at 1.6 MHz, 800 kHz, etc. all the way down. Just a suggestion -- there are many other ways. Dr. G. |