Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 26th 03, 02:14 AM
Tom Holden
 
Posts: n/a
Default RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added?

Apart from the new pcb, the main electrical difference between the Radio
Shack DX-394B and its immediate predecessor, the DX-394A, is the addition of
an emitter follower buffer amp between the output of the 2nd local
Oscillator (the emitter of the one transistor 44.5MHz VCXO) and the 2nd
mixer. The latter is a 2SK210-Y/YY VHF N-channel JFET; 1st IF is injected at
the gate and the 2nd LO at the drain.

Why would the designers add the buffer? What performance comparison should I
make between the A and the B model to assess whether it would be worthwhile
to retrofit a similar buffer to the A model? I can say that I have not
noticed any dramatic difference with my usual listening habits.

Tom


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer LJ Boatanchors 0 December 1st 04 02:12 AM
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer LJ Boatanchors 0 December 1st 04 02:12 AM
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? Tom Holden Equipment 8 November 27th 03 02:59 AM
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? Tom Holden Homebrew 8 November 27th 03 02:59 AM
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? Tom Holden Equipment 0 November 26th 03 02:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017