Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 02:30 AM
Bob Lewis \(AA4PB\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its not a simple matter of matching the transmitter to the radiation
resistance. First a short antenna is going to have a capacitive
reactance. You must add an equal amount of inductive reactance (a
loading coil) in order to cancel the capacitive reactance and make the
antenna resonant at the operating frequency. Then what the transmitter
needs to match is the total load impedance of the antenna "system".
The load impedance includes the radiation resistance plus the
resistance of the loading inductance plus the ground losses. The
hardest thing to get a handle on will be the ground losses. The
physical size of the transmitter housing is a small portion of a
wavelength and losses will change as you handle the unit.


  #32   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 05:46 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul Burridge wrote:
... the best way
to couple it to a PA with a 140 ohm output impedance?


Use a loading coil to resonate the antenna to 40MHz. Use a transformer
or tank circuit to transform the impedance.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #33   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 05:46 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul Burridge wrote:
... the best way
to couple it to a PA with a 140 ohm output impedance?


Use a loading coil to resonate the antenna to 40MHz. Use a transformer
or tank circuit to transform the impedance.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #34   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 06:39 AM
Mac
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:04:00 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:32:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

I can see from the way you have made your enquiry you havn't the foggiest
idea about what you are trying to accomplish. Do you know the frequency?
What transmitter power output do you have in mind - 10 milliwatts or 1KW?
For starters forget all about folding anything - you've been reading the
wrong books. However you now mention a short whip above a groundplane of
unknown construction.


Perhaps you didn't see the earlier posts on the subject. The frequency
is 40Mhz (radio control band) and the tx output stage as it stands
puts out maximum power of 475mW with a 140 ohm resistor as load. I
only *need* 50mW ERP., however, so can stand to see quite a bit of
loss from an inefficient antenna. The antenna I will be using is a
telescopic whip - exactly the same set-up as you see with model
vehicle radio control transmitters- which is what it is, in fact.
It ain't rocket science.
Someone out there must know the radiation resistance of such a
telescopic whip (which has a ground plane of just around 16 square
inches contained within the remote control handset) and the best way
to couple it to a PA with a 140 ohm output impedance?


You have had quite a few answers which seem pretty good to me.

I have a few comments.

Stop saying "radiation resistance" and start saying "input impedance" or
"feed impedance." Once you know the input impedance, getting maximum power
transfer is a straightforward matching problem that can be solved in a
variety of ways. True, you won't know for sure how much power is "getting
out," but some of the posts in this thread have given you some estimates.
If that isn't good enough, then you will have to measure by putting a
receive antenna in the far field.

Anyway, if you want to measure the input impedance, you should be able to
do it with a two-channel oscilloscope and a 40 MHz function generator.
Drive the antenna with the function generator and simultaneously measure
the input voltage and current, including the phase relationship between
them. The input impedance is V/I. To measure the current, put a suitably
sized resistor in series with the antenna and measure the voltage across
it. The voltage across the resistor should be small compared to the
voltage into the antenna. If it is too small to see, use a bigger resistor
until you can see it. Make sure both oscilloscope probes are grounded in
the same place. Unless you have a differential probe (in which case, use
it to measure the voltage across the current sensing resistor).

From what others have already said, it sounds like the input will be
extremely capacitive with a small series resistance. Once you know the
details, however, it will be easy to tell you how to match this to your
amplifier.

That's my $0.02.

Mac

  #35   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 06:39 AM
Mac
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:04:00 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:32:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

I can see from the way you have made your enquiry you havn't the foggiest
idea about what you are trying to accomplish. Do you know the frequency?
What transmitter power output do you have in mind - 10 milliwatts or 1KW?
For starters forget all about folding anything - you've been reading the
wrong books. However you now mention a short whip above a groundplane of
unknown construction.


Perhaps you didn't see the earlier posts on the subject. The frequency
is 40Mhz (radio control band) and the tx output stage as it stands
puts out maximum power of 475mW with a 140 ohm resistor as load. I
only *need* 50mW ERP., however, so can stand to see quite a bit of
loss from an inefficient antenna. The antenna I will be using is a
telescopic whip - exactly the same set-up as you see with model
vehicle radio control transmitters- which is what it is, in fact.
It ain't rocket science.
Someone out there must know the radiation resistance of such a
telescopic whip (which has a ground plane of just around 16 square
inches contained within the remote control handset) and the best way
to couple it to a PA with a 140 ohm output impedance?


You have had quite a few answers which seem pretty good to me.

I have a few comments.

Stop saying "radiation resistance" and start saying "input impedance" or
"feed impedance." Once you know the input impedance, getting maximum power
transfer is a straightforward matching problem that can be solved in a
variety of ways. True, you won't know for sure how much power is "getting
out," but some of the posts in this thread have given you some estimates.
If that isn't good enough, then you will have to measure by putting a
receive antenna in the far field.

Anyway, if you want to measure the input impedance, you should be able to
do it with a two-channel oscilloscope and a 40 MHz function generator.
Drive the antenna with the function generator and simultaneously measure
the input voltage and current, including the phase relationship between
them. The input impedance is V/I. To measure the current, put a suitably
sized resistor in series with the antenna and measure the voltage across
it. The voltage across the resistor should be small compared to the
voltage into the antenna. If it is too small to see, use a bigger resistor
until you can see it. Make sure both oscilloscope probes are grounded in
the same place. Unless you have a differential probe (in which case, use
it to measure the voltage across the current sensing resistor).

From what others have already said, it sounds like the input will be
extremely capacitive with a small series resistance. Once you know the
details, however, it will be easy to tell you how to match this to your
amplifier.

That's my $0.02.

Mac



  #36   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 08:01 AM
Tony Williams
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Paul Burridge wrote:

It ain't rocket science. Someone out there must know the
radiation resistance of such a telescopic whip (which has a
ground plane of just around 16 square inches contained within the
remote control handset) and the best way to couple it to a PA
with a 140 ohm output impedance?


Paul, standard CB antennas are loaded whips, for operation
at around 30MHz. Available in the CPC catalogue for about
£10 to £20, Perhaps you could start off with one of those
and modify to suit.

Note also that there is a 433MHz licence-free band for
short distance (100m) remote control. Pre-built Tx and
Rx modules are cheap, and a 433MHz antenna would be a
breeze.

www.cpc.co.uk or 08701 202530.

--
Tony Williams.
  #37   Report Post  
Old December 9th 03, 08:01 AM
Tony Williams
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Paul Burridge wrote:

It ain't rocket science. Someone out there must know the
radiation resistance of such a telescopic whip (which has a
ground plane of just around 16 square inches contained within the
remote control handset) and the best way to couple it to a PA
with a 140 ohm output impedance?


Paul, standard CB antennas are loaded whips, for operation
at around 30MHz. Available in the CPC catalogue for about
£10 to £20, Perhaps you could start off with one of those
and modify to suit.

Note also that there is a 433MHz licence-free band for
short distance (100m) remote control. Pre-built Tx and
Rx modules are cheap, and a 433MHz antenna would be a
breeze.

www.cpc.co.uk or 08701 202530.

--
Tony Williams.
  #38   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 03:27 AM
John Moriarity
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm looking forward
to making some outdoor antenna measurements using the new N2PK vector
network analyser... but not today brrrr!


Gee, Ian, you only will have to go out and do
the short-open-50R calibration at the end of
the coax. The software can move the reference
plane from the VNA out to the antenna feedpoint,
and you can do the rest from the comfort of
your shack!

Yes, I'm on Harold's list for a kit.

73, John - K6QQ, who thought that after retirement
he'd never have the use of a VNA again!


  #39   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 03:27 AM
John Moriarity
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm looking forward
to making some outdoor antenna measurements using the new N2PK vector
network analyser... but not today brrrr!


Gee, Ian, you only will have to go out and do
the short-open-50R calibration at the end of
the coax. The software can move the reference
plane from the VNA out to the antenna feedpoint,
and you can do the rest from the comfort of
your shack!

Yes, I'm on Harold's list for a kit.

73, John - K6QQ, who thought that after retirement
he'd never have the use of a VNA again!


  #40   Report Post  
Old December 13th 03, 07:55 AM
John Woodgate
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I read in sci.electronics.design that Ian White, G3SEK
wrote (in ) about
'Measuring radiation resistance', on Mon, 8 Dec 2003:
I'm looking forward
to making some outdoor antenna measurements using the new N2PK vector
network analyser


Is N2PK a call-sign? Are there any details of this analyser on the
Internet?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency Reg Edwards Antenna 23 January 10th 04 11:56 AM
Measuring radiation resistance Reg Edwards Antenna 11 December 13th 03 12:51 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017