Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Bruhns wrote:
So the right way to do this is to lower the _effective_ minimum capacitance. You can do that by adding an inductor, to cancel out capacitance. You can end up making the tuning range as wide as you want, but at the expense of the crystal (ceramic resonator in your case) being less of the overall frequency determination. In other words, there comes a point where you'd be as well off to just do an LC oscillator. But to double, say, the range, it's a good way to go. I guess I re-discovered what was already well known, but a few years ago I designed such a VCXO, and was amazed how linear the freq-vs-controlvoltage curve was (a good thing for use in a PLL). Don't know what range you're trying to achieve, but I had no trouble getting a bit more than 0.1% (~20kHz at 14MHz) that way, with a crystal. An inductor in series with the varactors, then another one in parallel with the series combo can get you a very wide range of impedance from a decent varactor. Cheers, Phil Hobbs |