Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:44:04 +0000, Leon Heller
wrote: Paul Burridge wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:50:52 -0800, "Tim Wescott" wrote: Normally you'd expect the final amplifier to be fairly "stiff" - the output power should be inversely proportional to the resistor you put on it. ??? Shirley, some mistake. Both AF and HF power amplifiers generally have a very low output impedance. Motorola's AN721 app note on impedance matching networks for RF transistors explains this. This doesn't apply to QRP output stages, though. Hi, Leon, Do you know Brian (G4BCO) by any chance? My - admittedly little - understanding of the situation is that the power transferred into a resistor (regardless of power level) will be maximised when Rs=Rl,. whereupon half the power is dissipated in the final device and half in the load. Tim's posts seems to refute this basic truism. Clearly the statement that the output power should be inversely proportional to the load resistance *must* be false. -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna |