| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:35:24 -0800, "Tim Wescott"
wrote: Well, you're objecting rather strongly to an assertion that I never made. In theory if you want to get the maximum available power out of a generator you _do_ match it's output impedance. In practice if you do this with most RF final amplifiers you will reduce your final element (whether transistor or tube) to slag -- that's why modern commercial radios have SWR protection circuitry. Please see my reply to your post starting with "Hi Leon" for a full explanation, and please actually read it before replying. Remember also that everything I say (including the attempt to match output impedances with the wall socket -- I was only 8 but that's no excuse) has been backed up by experament. Okay, so if I understand you correctly you're saying that whilst you should try to match impedances in Class A; it's inapplicable in Class C? It's just an operation class distinction? -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
| 74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
| 74HC series RF output impedance | Homebrew | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||