Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:26:59 -0600, "Steve Nosko"
wrote: Motorola's first solid state 450 car phone, the MK, used a 50 W 150 MHz PA followed by a varactor tripler for 10W at 450. Varactor triplers are tricky however. Steve K;9;d/c/i The worst is suppression of 150MHz, it is almost impossible to suppress it. Bought some UK commercial integrated modules for 432MHz which was fed from 144MHz 1W, had a 20W amplifier within a very well screened and silvered box, but radiation on 144MHz were almost impossible to suppress, the only way out was to place it deep at the lowest point of the basement with ferrite chokes on the cables LA8AK -- Amount of SPAM is so large that MailWasher must delete 99% of the incoming mails Cannot check every email manually. Please use intelligent title for email. Mails without titles or using just "hi" is deleted |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:26:59 -0600, "Steve Nosko"
wrote: Motorola's first solid state 450 car phone, the MK, used a 50 W 150 MHz PA followed by a varactor tripler for 10W at 450. Varactor triplers are tricky however. Steve K;9;d/c/i The worst is suppression of 150MHz, it is almost impossible to suppress it. Bought some UK commercial integrated modules for 432MHz which was fed from 144MHz 1W, had a 20W amplifier within a very well screened and silvered box, but radiation on 144MHz were almost impossible to suppress, the only way out was to place it deep at the lowest point of the basement with ferrite chokes on the cables LA8AK -- Amount of SPAM is so large that MailWasher must delete 99% of the incoming mails Cannot check every email manually. Please use intelligent title for email. Mails without titles or using just "hi" is deleted |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Motorola's first solid state 450 car phone, the MK, used a 50 W 150 MHz PA
followed by a varactor tripler for 10W at 450. Varactor triplers are tricky however. Steve K;9;d/c/i "Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:22:32 -0800, "Tim Wescott" wrote: The varactor capacitance change is instantaneous -- think of a capacitor who's plate spacing is dependent on it's voltage. This is why varactors are used for frequency multiplication -- that capacitance change "squeezes" the pulse to generate lots of harmonics. Rubbish. Varactors are not used for freqency mulitplication. They are freequenty used in VXCOs for modulating (or otherwise varying) the oscillator output frequency by means of applying a DC bias voltage which alters the capacitance of the PN junction. -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:22:32 -0800, "Tim Wescott"
wrote: The varactor capacitance change is instantaneous -- think of a capacitor who's plate spacing is dependent on it's voltage. This is why varactors are used for frequency multiplication -- that capacitance change "squeezes" the pulse to generate lots of harmonics. Rubbish. Varactors are not used for freqency mulitplication. They are freequenty used in VXCOs for modulating (or otherwise varying) the oscillator output frequency by means of applying a DC bias voltage which alters the capacitance of the PN junction. -- "I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it." - Winston Churchill |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The varactor capacitance change is instantaneous -- think of a capacitor
who's plate spacing is dependent on it's voltage. This is why varactors are used for frequency multiplication -- that capacitance change "squeezes" the pulse to generate lots of harmonics. So your oscillation voltage will certainly affect the tuning, and the forward bias effects will be most unfortunate. I have modelled varactor diodes by dinking with the area parameter of the SPICE diode model, but I'm not a pro in that regard and don't know the "right" way to do it. SPICE is also not the tool for determining the behavior of nonlinear high-Q circuits (I believe the best tool still involves FR-4 and lots of cussing). "James Fenech" wrote in message ... Hello, I have a general question regarding tuning diodes: Does the oscillation voltage alter their capacitance, or is capacitance a slow changing value - like resistance and PIN diodes? The reason I ask is that I am spicing (simulation) a VCO I wish to build (wide range 140-240MHz) and get an oscillation voltage of 20 volts peak (maybe the Q is too high). This high oscillation voltage would easily swamp the tuning voltage, 3-15 volts, and forward bias the diode itself. If anyone wishs to reply directly they must remove the "xxx" from the return address or write to: james dot fenech at nec dot com dot au Thanks, James. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Source for Microwave Diodes? | Homebrew | |||
Source for Microwave Diodes? | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood TS-440S Replacement Diodes? | Equipment | |||
Kenwood TS-440S Replacement Diodes? | Equipment | |||
pin diode attenuators and switches | Homebrew |