Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
I think the main reason for back-to-back diodes is to prevent rectification of the RF. Rectification can cause several bad things, including pushing DC current back out the tuning voltage line, instability, and increased phase noise. Having said that, I tried back-to-back diodes a couple times and I don't ever recall ending up with it in the final design, so it must not have added all that much value. On the negative side, it halves the capacitance. One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Joe W3JDR "Steve Nosko" wrote in message ... My comments are colored by experience desigining quite low noise, relitavely narrow bandwidth VCOs, so all the other comments are very valid. I will note that there are two aspects of noise to consider, that I can think of off hand. One is that: 1) Too low of an absolute DC voltage on the varactors will make for a noisy VCO and 2) A wide tuning range means that the varactor is relatively tightly coupled into the oscillator which means that control line noise/spurs you'll have to watch control line noise & spurs. 3) This also means the Varactors have more effect on the oscillator Q and therefore can also mean increased noise. OK nobody expects the Spanish inquisition. If you can determine the actual noise performance and keep it in mind that the analyzer has a noise limit, you'll be ok. Been away from it too long and can't seem to recall why we used to use two, back-to-back varactors...brain is full...seems like it was to reduce the voltage across the varactor. 'guards, Steve K;9;D:C:I "W3JDR" wrote in message ... 2:1 tuning range with varactor tuning is very doable in the frequency range he's considering. I've done 3:1 at lower frequencies. No steep hill at all. Joe W3JDR "Steve Nosko" wrote in message ... You're climbing a steep hill here James. It is the % change in frequency that is the problem. Professional spec analysers use a 2 GHz LO with a 2:1 range (to scan 0-2GHz), but I believe that is a magnetically tuned YIG resonator. If you could get the frequency higher, so the sweep range is narrower, then mix to the desired freq with a balanced mixer...that would be an easier VCO design. Steve K;9;d;c;i The punctuation is my feeble attempt at spam-bot blocking. "James Fenech" wrote in message ... Hi Roy, thanks for the suggestion. I am considering buying this book. Can I ask how much theory, and how deep does it go? I am an engineer (digital electornics and software background) and actually like some theory to help me understand what I am doing. I already have some "real" test equipment, 50MHz CRO, signal generator, multimeter, etc. So "simple" test equipment may not be too much of an improvement. I've looked over the internet, and some books that I have, but found no real example circuit on wideband VCOs. The only "sort of close enough" circuit I found is at: http://www.newwaveinstruments.com/resources/rf_microwave_resources/sections/oscillator_vco_theory_design_circuit.htm#Voltage%2 0Controled%20Oscillator%20(VCO)%20Circuits The second one down - Colpitts. Are there any such examples in this book? Thanks, James. "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... I highly recommend _Experimental Methods in RF Design_, by Hayward, Cambell, and Larkin. It's published by the ARRL and available from them and numerous other sources. Besides theory and a lot of real, practical, tested circuits and projects, it includes simple test equipment you can build yourself. Roy Lewallen, W7EL James Fenech wrote: . . . I have the ARRL handbook (1997 or so) but this doesn't have much in the way of theory. Is there any other reference anyone can recommend? . . . |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by
Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). The way the varactor is made will affect the noise performance. Ask the manufacturers which process yields their best phase-noise performance. Most of them are very helpful. As I recall, planar, epitaxial construction, with thermal compression bonded leads gave my best results. Hyperabrupt diodes gave the worst. But things change rapidly these days, so ask. 73, John - K6QQ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:31:56 -0800, "John Moriarity"
wrote: One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Or is it simply that when using multiple varactors in parallel, the amount of capacitance needed from each varactor is reduced, hence a higher tuning voltage must be used with the same inductance ? With a high tuning voltage, the capacitance/voltage ratio is smaller, hence the capacitance difference would be smaller on the separate RF half cycles. This would reduce the phase noise. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). Your observations would support my theory, since adding further varactors would only increase the tuning voltage slightly with the same inductance. Paul OH3LWR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:50:46 +0200, Paul Keinanen
wrote: On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:31:56 -0800, "John Moriarity" wrote: One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Or is it simply that when using multiple varactors in parallel, the amount of capacitance needed from each varactor is reduced, hence a higher tuning voltage must be used with the same inductance ? With a high tuning voltage, the capacitance/voltage ratio is smaller, hence the capacitance difference would be smaller on the separate RF half cycles. This would reduce the phase noise. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). Your observations would support my theory, since adding further varactors would only increase the tuning voltage slightly with the same inductance. Paul OH3LWR suppose the anti-paralell configuration could improve it further like http://home.online.no/~la8ak/images/1et27.gif , first got the idea from high level PIN switch in Electronics design, but have not seen the application elsewhere JM http://home.online.no/~la8ak/L2.htm -- Amount of SPAM is so large that MailWasher must delete 99% of the incoming mails Cannot check every email manually. Please use intelligent title for email. Mails without titles or using just "hi" is deleted |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:50:46 +0200, Paul Keinanen
wrote: On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:31:56 -0800, "John Moriarity" wrote: One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Or is it simply that when using multiple varactors in parallel, the amount of capacitance needed from each varactor is reduced, hence a higher tuning voltage must be used with the same inductance ? With a high tuning voltage, the capacitance/voltage ratio is smaller, hence the capacitance difference would be smaller on the separate RF half cycles. This would reduce the phase noise. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). Your observations would support my theory, since adding further varactors would only increase the tuning voltage slightly with the same inductance. Paul OH3LWR suppose the anti-paralell configuration could improve it further like http://home.online.no/~la8ak/images/1et27.gif , first got the idea from high level PIN switch in Electronics design, but have not seen the application elsewhere JM http://home.online.no/~la8ak/L2.htm -- Amount of SPAM is so large that MailWasher must delete 99% of the incoming mails Cannot check every email manually. Please use intelligent title for email. Mails without titles or using just "hi" is deleted |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:31:56 -0800, "John Moriarity"
wrote: One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Or is it simply that when using multiple varactors in parallel, the amount of capacitance needed from each varactor is reduced, hence a higher tuning voltage must be used with the same inductance ? With a high tuning voltage, the capacitance/voltage ratio is smaller, hence the capacitance difference would be smaller on the separate RF half cycles. This would reduce the phase noise. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). Your observations would support my theory, since adding further varactors would only increase the tuning voltage slightly with the same inductance. Paul OH3LWR |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "W3JDR"
writes: Steve, I think the main reason for back-to-back diodes is to prevent rectification of the RF. Rectification can cause several bad things, including pushing DC current back out the tuning voltage line, instability, and increased phase noise. Having said that, I tried back-to-back diodes a couple times and I don't ever recall ending up with it in the final design, so it must not have added all that much value. On the negative side, it halves the capacitance. One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Variable-capacitance diodes exhibit that phenomenon only in reverse-DC-bias connections. In forward-DC-bias connection they behave generally like ordinary diodes, conducting very little current until about 0.6 V across the junction. A single variable-capacitance diode across an RF circuit will conduct - and thus have an effect on the RF tuned circuit - when the combination of DC tuning bias and RF voltages are above the forward-conduction breakpoint. The purpose of "back-to-back" connection is to keep the (now two) variable-capacitance diodes always in reverse-conduction...the RF voltage (peak-to-peak) is not supposed to exceed either the break- down voltage of the diodes or cause either of them to be forward- biased during any part of the RF cycle. With no forward conduction, the variable capacitance diodes remain just that - variable capacitances. When forward conduction occurs, it adds more non-linearity to the RF circuit and tends to decrease the action of the variable capacitance. When used in low-level RF stages of a receiver input, the RF voltage hardly ever exceeds 1 V peak-to-peak and thus the variable capacitance diode never goes into forward conduction. Single diodes can be used there without doubling-up. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by
Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. If the diodes are the limiting factor, it can help. The second diode seemed to do the most good, the third, a little more, but any more didn't help (in my designs). The way the varactor is made will affect the noise performance. Ask the manufacturers which process yields their best phase-noise performance. Most of them are very helpful. As I recall, planar, epitaxial construction, with thermal compression bonded leads gave my best results. Hyperabrupt diodes gave the worst. But things change rapidly these days, so ask. 73, John - K6QQ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "W3JDR"
writes: Steve, I think the main reason for back-to-back diodes is to prevent rectification of the RF. Rectification can cause several bad things, including pushing DC current back out the tuning voltage line, instability, and increased phase noise. Having said that, I tried back-to-back diodes a couple times and I don't ever recall ending up with it in the final design, so it must not have added all that much value. On the negative side, it halves the capacitance. One technique to improve the phase noise in wide-band VCO's was shown by Ulrich Rhode. He uses several diodes in parallel in order to decrease the RF current in each diode, reportedly lowering losses and improving noise. I never tried it myself. Variable-capacitance diodes exhibit that phenomenon only in reverse-DC-bias connections. In forward-DC-bias connection they behave generally like ordinary diodes, conducting very little current until about 0.6 V across the junction. A single variable-capacitance diode across an RF circuit will conduct - and thus have an effect on the RF tuned circuit - when the combination of DC tuning bias and RF voltages are above the forward-conduction breakpoint. The purpose of "back-to-back" connection is to keep the (now two) variable-capacitance diodes always in reverse-conduction...the RF voltage (peak-to-peak) is not supposed to exceed either the break- down voltage of the diodes or cause either of them to be forward- biased during any part of the RF cycle. With no forward conduction, the variable capacitance diodes remain just that - variable capacitances. When forward conduction occurs, it adds more non-linearity to the RF circuit and tends to decrease the action of the variable capacitance. When used in low-level RF stages of a receiver input, the RF voltage hardly ever exceeds 1 V peak-to-peak and thus the variable capacitance diode never goes into forward conduction. Single diodes can be used there without doubling-up. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Source for Microwave Diodes? | Homebrew | |||
Source for Microwave Diodes? | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood TS-440S Replacement Diodes? | Equipment | |||
Kenwood TS-440S Replacement Diodes? | Equipment | |||
pin diode attenuators and switches | Homebrew |