Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't mean to beat a dead topic to a second death, but in case you wanted to
know NASA uses tantalums extensively as replacements for electrolytics on-orbit (on station & shuttle). I don't can't recite the reasoning verbatim, but it is an M&P (materials and processes) issue, having to do with operating at low pressures and also the dangers of electrolytics entering various failure modes due to overheating in space (no bouyancy-driven convection). Tantalums tend not to fail catastrophically (pop or explode) when thermally stressed. Jason Dugas KB5URQ NASA-JSC "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message ... Over the last few years I've acquired quite a few consumer electronincs pcbs including TVs, VCRs, stereos, etc, so when I discovered that I needed a tantalum to repair some test equipment I was going to salvage a tantalum. I couldn't find one anywhere, so I assume they're too expensive or too unrelaible for high end consumer electronics. A couple of the boards were from my personal stuff purchased new. One example is a MGA Mitsubishi rear projection TV that operated flawlessly for nearly 20 years of daily use. Most of my test equipment comes from hamfests and is surplus after becoming obsolete and non-operative in less than 20 years. That leads me to wonder what the real story is behind tantalum capacitors. What do the experts have to say? tnx hank wd5jfr |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Equipment | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew |