Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hello folks , hope someone can help me
i have built some 433MHz CW transmitters and used them for tracking model airplanes and stuff so I can find them if they get lost , the only ones i have built so far are only a couple of mW output , the company make they low power modules say no license is required for their use ok , so now i want to build a higher power one for greater distance , thinking of using the linx modules which can either have 10mW or 50mW output at 433MHz CW my questions 1) as power increases at some point i will need to get a technician class license , no problem as i will do that , but my question is at what power level is this required ? can you point me to where this is defined ? 2) i know building little transmitters for sale as a product requires an FCC registration number ... but building only a couple for your own use does not .. correct ? ( if so hams couldn't ever build their own transmitters ) thanks for any assistance ... stan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there's a lot of technically illegal radio building that's tolerated
because it's not bothering anyone. Building your own 2mW transmitter and using it for fun is a lot like driving at 90mph on a deserted freeway -- they're both illegal, but if you do it well the law will look the other way. This is how we all got away with those AM transmitters on our RatShack 100-in-1 project kits when we were kids. Building your own transmitters that are within the rules for unlicensed use is technically illegal but practically OK (see above). Amatuer operators are allowed to use our own equipment because we're presumed to know what we're doing by virtue of having passed the test for the license, and because the gov'ment knows that we're self-policed and will try to get violators to shape up on our own before anyone calls the FCC. By all means go ahead and get a licence -- then you can not only dink with building a better beacon, but you can fly on 50MHz and (a) always have a frequency to yourself and (b) confuse everyone with your single-digit frequency flag. If you do this then technically (there's that word again!) you'll have to rig the beacon up to send your call sign automatically at least every 10 minutes, but aside from the 100W power output this would be a good way of distinguishing _your_ beacon from everyone else's. You may be able to get away with putting a placard with your call sign on the aircraft, but I think that rule only covers the transmitter with which you're flying the plane. "stan" wrote in message ... hello folks , hope someone can help me i have built some 433MHz CW transmitters and used them for tracking model airplanes and stuff so I can find them if they get lost , the only ones i have built so far are only a couple of mW output , the company make they low power modules say no license is required for their use ok , so now i want to build a higher power one for greater distance , thinking of using the linx modules which can either have 10mW or 50mW output at 433MHz CW my questions 1) as power increases at some point i will need to get a technician class license , no problem as i will do that , but my question is at what power level is this required ? can you point me to where this is defined ? 2) i know building little transmitters for sale as a product requires an FCC registration number ... but building only a couple for your own use does not .. correct ? ( if so hams couldn't ever build their own transmitters ) thanks for any assistance ... stan |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tim Wescott wrote: I think there's a lot of technically illegal radio building that's tolerated because it's not bothering anyone. Building your own 2mW transmitter and using it for fun is a lot like driving at 90mph on a deserted freeway -- they're both illegal, but if you do it well the law will look the other way. This is how we all got away with those AM transmitters on our RatShack 100-in-1 project kits when we were kids. Building your own transmitters that are within the rules for unlicensed use is technically illegal but practically OK (see above). Actually, as I read it, if you homebrew a system which stays within the FCC Part 15 limits, it's perfectly legal. The rules have a specific "no certification required" exception for systems which are built for home use, not-from-a-kit, in small quantities. By all means go ahead and get a licence Definitely! -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh that's good to know. I have part 97 ('cause I'm KG7LI) and part 68
('cause I occasionally work with phone equipment), but not part 15. I'll have to take a look sometime. "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , Tim Wescott wrote: I think there's a lot of technically illegal radio building that's tolerated because it's not bothering anyone. Building your own 2mW transmitter and using it for fun is a lot like driving at 90mph on a deserted freeway -- they're both illegal, but if you do it well the law will look the other way. This is how we all got away with those AM transmitters on our RatShack 100-in-1 project kits when we were kids. Building your own transmitters that are within the rules for unlicensed use is technically illegal but practically OK (see above). Actually, as I read it, if you homebrew a system which stays within the FCC Part 15 limits, it's perfectly legal. The rules have a specific "no certification required" exception for systems which are built for home use, not-from-a-kit, in small quantities. By all means go ahead and get a licence Definitely! -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming you're in the U.S., you need a copy of Part 15 of the FCC
rules, which deals with unlicensed transmitters among other things. I imagine it's on the web these days -- if not, it's available from the government printing office for a nominal charge. Roy Lewallen, W7EL stan wrote: hello folks , hope someone can help me i have built some 433MHz CW transmitters and used them for tracking model airplanes and stuff so I can find them if they get lost , the only ones i have built so far are only a couple of mW output , the company make they low power modules say no license is required for their use ok , so now i want to build a higher power one for greater distance , thinking of using the linx modules which can either have 10mW or 50mW output at 433MHz CW my questions 1) as power increases at some point i will need to get a technician class license , no problem as i will do that , but my question is at what power level is this required ? can you point me to where this is defined ? 2) i know building little transmitters for sale as a product requires an FCC registration number ... but building only a couple for your own use does not .. correct ? ( if so hams couldn't ever build their own transmitters ) thanks for any assistance ... stan |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the US government will refer to it as "Part 15 of CFR 47" -- CFR 47
being volume 47 of the code of federal regulations. If you get if from the gov'ment as a book it will come bound with other parts -- my 1992 set of CFR 47 has three volumes. "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Assuming you're in the U.S., you need a copy of Part 15 of the FCC rules, which deals with unlicensed transmitters among other things. I imagine it's on the web these days -- if not, it's available from the government printing office for a nominal charge. Roy Lewallen, W7EL stan wrote: hello folks , hope someone can help me i have built some 433MHz CW transmitters and used them for tracking model airplanes and stuff so I can find them if they get lost , the only ones i have built so far are only a couple of mW output , the company make they low power modules say no license is required for their use ok , so now i want to build a higher power one for greater distance , thinking of using the linx modules which can either have 10mW or 50mW output at 433MHz CW my questions 1) as power increases at some point i will need to get a technician class license , no problem as i will do that , but my question is at what power level is this required ? can you point me to where this is defined ? 2) i know building little transmitters for sale as a product requires an FCC registration number ... but building only a couple for your own use does not .. correct ? ( if so hams couldn't ever build their own transmitters ) thanks for any assistance ... stan |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Tim Wescott"
writes: And the US government will refer to it as "Part 15 of CFR 47" -- CFR 47 being volume 47 of the code of federal regulations. If you get if from the gov'ment as a book it will come bound with other parts -- my 1992 set of CFR 47 has three volumes. Suggestion: Go to the FCC website and click the Office of Engineering and Technology button (to the right). OET page will let you access Part 15 rules directly instead of going to the Government Printing Office site and doing small (free) downloads of any portion of Parts of the Code of Federal Regulations. My 1995 set of 47 C.F.R. was five volumes and cost $120. GPO has branch offices in most of the larger cities of the USA. No shipping charges. Individual volumes are available. Part 15 is still available free over the Internet. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
It has been a while since I read it, but isn't the bulk of the requirement a field strength number? I run a validation department and we measure field strength for our products. If there is a section of part 15 which gets specific (like I think the old 136 KHz part or the AM band where a power and antenna IS specified, then he's ok. Otherwise he'll have to measure field strength. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Assuming you're in the U.S., you need a copy of Part 15 of the FCC rules, which deals with unlicensed transmitters among other things. I imagine it's on the web these days -- if not, it's available from the government printing office for a nominal charge. Roy Lewallen, W7EL stan wrote: hello folks , hope someone can help me i have built some 433MHz CW transmitters and used them for tracking model airplanes and stuff so I can find them if they get lost , the only ones i have built so far are only a couple of mW output , the company make they low power modules say no license is required for their use ok , so now i want to build a higher power one for greater distance , thinking of using the linx modules which can either have 10mW or 50mW output at 433MHz CW my questions 1) as power increases at some point i will need to get a technician class license , no problem as i will do that , but my question is at what power level is this required ? can you point me to where this is defined ? 2) i know building little transmitters for sale as a product requires an FCC registration number ... but building only a couple for your own use does not .. correct ? ( if so hams couldn't ever build their own transmitters ) thanks for any assistance ... stan |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
Roy, It has been a while since I read it, but isn't the bulk of the requirement a field strength number? I run a validation department and we measure field strength for our products. If there is a section of part 15 which gets specific (like I think the old 136 KHz part or the AM band where a power and antenna IS specified, then he's ok. Otherwise he'll have to measure field strength. Yes, virtually all the part 15 specifications are field strength. However, if the power is known, the field strength can often be approximated by modeling or by making some assumptions about antenna gain and efficiency. Accurate measurement of field strength isn't trivial. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
Roy, It has been a while since I read it, but isn't the bulk of the requirement a field strength number? I run a validation department and we measure field strength for our products. If there is a section of part 15 which gets specific (like I think the old 136 KHz part or the AM band where a power and antenna IS specified, then he's ok. Otherwise he'll have to measure field strength. Yes, virtually all the part 15 specifications are field strength. However, if the power is known, the field strength can often be approximated by modeling or by making some assumptions about antenna gain and efficiency. Accurate measurement of field strength isn't trivial. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RFI from wireless 433Mhz systems ??? | Equipment | |||
Antenna matching 433MHz | Antenna | |||
Help: Need Kansas City Tracker software / KC Tracker driver | Antenna | |||
Addtion to : What is with W6NEK HF Beacon Tracker? | Dx | |||
What is with W6NEK HF Beacon Tracker? | Dx |