Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/1/2015 11:20 AM, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 01/12/2015 16:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Galaxy FM-210 em no ...the clegg and the drake tr22 six channel xtal job is about as far back as I go ....with 2m stuff anyway...a bit more modern was playing with a weird tri-band drake uv3 in 1979 ....about as modern as I went with merrycan gear .... The FM-210 was the first solid state FM rig made for 2M ham bands, if not the first 2M FM rig specifically for the ham bands. Before that came out, we used converted tube-type Motorola "G" and "A" strips and GE Prog lines. Converting these from VHF high band (150-174Mhz) was pretty easy. Change crystals, add a few pf to the receiver front end and transmitter output circuit and it would tune right up. But most were single channel; if you found a dual channel one you were in hog heaven. And the current drain - most had vibrator power supplies, although a few older ones had dynamotors. 10-25W, depending on the model, and would pull 8-10 amps in receive and up to 20 amps keyed. Those were the good old days, when you could actually work on stuff (like you could cars). -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/12/2015 16:50, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 12/1/2015 11:20 AM, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 01/12/2015 16:09, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Galaxy FM-210 em no ...the clegg and the drake tr22 six channel xtal job is about as far back as I go ....with 2m stuff anyway...a bit more modern was playing with a weird tri-band drake uv3 in 1979 ....about as modern as I went with merrycan gear .... The FM-210 was the first solid state FM rig made for 2M ham bands, if not the first 2M FM rig specifically for the ham bands. Before that came out, we used converted tube-type Motorola "G" and "A" strips and GE Prog lines. Converting these from VHF high band (150-174Mhz) was pretty easy. Change crystals, add a few pf to the receiver front end and transmitter output circuit and it would tune right up. But most were single channel; if you found a dual channel one you were in hog heaven. And the current drain - most had vibrator power supplies, although a few older ones had dynamotors. 10-25W, depending on the model, and would pull 8-10 amps in receive and up to 20 amps keyed. Those were the good old days, when you could actually work on stuff (like you could cars). yes but you can still work on cars if you are OBD2 equipped to figure out what bit to replace...! https://www.photobox.co.uk/my/album?album_id=3404690477 -- Man at Oxfam All things DIGITAL do not work No spare wheel isn't progress Class A radio hams do exist A rubber cam belt is not acceptable I never asked to join the Freemasons |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The end of the profiteering emporia? | Equipment | |||
Hamfest bums on e-bay profiteering on Katrina ? | CB | |||
Hamfest bums on e-bay profiteering on Katrina ? | Shortwave |