Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
"Richard" wrote in message ... Steve Nosko wrote: I believe he is talking about adjacent channel signals which are much stronger than the desired and trying to see if there is a way to "fix" that. ... Capture effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_effect It's an intersting phenomena, and potentially useful. But I believe not here. Only for co-channel interference. If I could phase null (at the antenna) the local stronger signal ... if you cannot get the inteferring signal below the This is a sticky problem if the undesired is only 100kHz off center with the standard 200kHz system design. I this case you can have significant energy within the Rx passband coming from the undesired. I can't say how low the undesired needs to be. In the UK, where I am, the spacing between channels is 100Khz. And that is a real problem, because, as you say a lot of RF energy from the undesired station gets into the IF passband. And so basically I was wondeting if the technolgy exists for the RX to know that energy from the undesired station, 100Khz off frequency, is to be ignored in the demodulation. I don't think it can be done, but if it could somehow the electronics would have to associate the unwanted energy with a non wanted station, and in a sense, ignore it. Just wondering if the technoloy is around to do that. Probably not. Only likely possible thru digital computing methods maybe. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New antenna technology??? | Antenna | |||
FS, Book, 'Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems' & 'Transmission Technology..." | Antenna | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment |