"Michael Black" wrote in message
...
"Jan-Martin Noeding, LA8AK" ) writes:
Found a source for 7360 and it is some interest among my friends for
using this tube in HF receivers, particularly for 80 and 40m
It was mentioned an article by W2PUL(?) in QST using a high current
twin triode as RF amplifier.
Have seen the SSR-1 rx schematics. Is some more notes available on
some sites for a modern version of receiver using these devices? I
suspect some parts of the receiver could be improved over the practice
used in the 60's
Any suggestions?

A couple, With Colin Horrabin's "H" mode mixer and the later switch mode
mixers available for well under a buck, the mixer has been removed from
being the concern it once was in receiver design. Since that topology, and
the 4066/312X/500X solid state mixers yield better linearity than the
following filters do, why return to the 7360? It was a fine mixer in it's
day. That day is LONG past. Try operating a 7360 in any close proximity to a
flourescent ballast. It will quickly disallusion you as to it's relative
worth except as a curiosity. Vacuum tube receiver technology and modern is
an oxymoron.

W4ZCB

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:30:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Aha! I just noted from Paul's post that "my" oscillator is called a
two-transistor Butler. Wonder when that was conceived? I've been
using the my direct-coupled version for 40 years.

Interesting. This is the type I've decided to build as the basis for
my next sweep generator attempt, since it's claimed the config is more
amenable to being pulled than most others (although I won't be
attempting to pull it anything like as much as my first abortive
attempt using a Cmos-based inverter). Do you find it's a reliable and
stable design, Jim? I assume if it wasn't you wouldn't still be using
it!
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:30:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Aha! I just noted from Paul's post that "my" oscillator is called a
two-transistor Butler. Wonder when that was conceived? I've been
using the my direct-coupled version for 40 years.

Interesting. This is the type I've decided to build as the basis for
my next sweep generator attempt, since it's claimed the config is more
amenable to being pulled than most others (although I won't be
attempting to pull it anything like as much as my first abortive
attempt using a Cmos-based inverter). Do you find it's a reliable and
stable design, Jim? I assume if it wasn't you wouldn't still be using
it!
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Joe
W3JDR

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:30:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Aha! I just noted from Paul's post that "my" oscillator is called a
two-transistor Butler. Wonder when that was conceived? I've been
using the my direct-coupled version for 40 years.

Interesting. This is the type I've decided to build as the basis for
my next sweep generator attempt, since it's claimed the config is more
amenable to being pulled than most others (although I won't be
attempting to pull it anything like as much as my first abortive
attempt using a Cmos-based inverter). Do you find it's a reliable and
stable design, Jim? I assume if it wasn't you wouldn't still be using
it!
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Joe
W3JDR

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:30:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Aha! I just noted from Paul's post that "my" oscillator is called a
two-transistor Butler. Wonder when that was conceived? I've been
using the my direct-coupled version for 40 years.

Interesting. This is the type I've decided to build as the basis for
my next sweep generator attempt, since it's claimed the config is more
amenable to being pulled than most others (although I won't be
attempting to pull it anything like as much as my first abortive
attempt using a Cmos-based inverter). Do you find it's a reliable and
stable design, Jim? I assume if it wasn't you wouldn't still be using
it!
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:39:46 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Certainly. I've just finished roughing out the block diagram, actually
and will try to post it later for some constructive criticism. It's
basically just to sweep a half-meg segment in the 40Mhz band for the
purpose of testing filters to improve rx selectivity in R/C
applications..
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:39:46 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Certainly. I've just finished roughing out the block diagram, actually
and will try to post it later for some constructive criticism. It's
basically just to sweep a half-meg segment in the 40Mhz band for the
purpose of testing filters to improve rx selectivity in R/C
applications..
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

Paul,
You might want to check out what I built to do that sort of job with great
precision:
http://mysite.verizon.net/jdrocci/

Joe
W3JDR


"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:39:46 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Certainly. I've just finished roughing out the block diagram, actually
and will try to post it later for some constructive criticism. It's
basically just to sweep a half-meg segment in the 40Mhz band for the
purpose of testing filters to improve rx selectivity in R/C
applications..
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

Paul,
You might want to check out what I built to do that sort of job with great
precision:
http://mysite.verizon.net/jdrocci/

Joe
W3JDR


"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:39:46 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:

Paul,
I think you started off speaking about crystal oscillators, but you just
mentioned a sweep generator. Can you tell us a little more about your
application??

Certainly. I've just finished roughing out the block diagram, actually
and will try to post it later for some constructive criticism. It's
basically just to sweep a half-meg segment in the 40Mhz band for the
purpose of testing filters to improve rx selectivity in R/C
applications..
--

The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:30:12 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Aha! I just noted from Paul's post that "my" oscillator is called a
two-transistor Butler. Wonder when that was conceived? I've been
using the my direct-coupled version for 40 years.

Interesting. This is the type I've decided to build as the basis for
my next sweep generator attempt, since it's claimed the config is more
amenable to being pulled than most others (although I won't be
attempting to pull it anything like as much as my first abortive
attempt using a Cmos-based inverter). Do you find it's a reliable and
stable design, Jim? I assume if it wasn't you wouldn't still be using
it!

Why not use a VCO built from an LC oscillator? Its really easy to build one
with a single transistor that sweeps your band.

I built a simple one that looked like this:


+------+--------+-------+
| | | | /
| .-. C|L1 --- C1
--- | |R1 C| ---
C3 --- | | C| / |
| '-' | |
| | +-------+------o antenna
| | | |
___ | | |c --- C2
Vin o-|___|-+------+-----b| Q1 ---
R4 | | |e |
| | | |
| | | |
| | +-------+
| | |
| .-. .-.
--- | |R2 | | R3
C4 --- | | | |
| '-' '-'
| | |
+------+--------+

Q1 = 2N3904

L1 = 0.5uH
C1 = 20pF variable from 10pF to 80pF
C2 = 4.7pF
C3 = .22uF
C4 = 1uF
R1 = 47k
R2 = 10k
R3 = 1k
R4 = 100

created by Andy´s ASCII-Circuit v1.24.140803 Beta www.tech-chat.de

I was able to sweep the band from 40MHz to 42MHz by first adjusting C1, then
changing Vin (with a pot) to vary the output frequency. I built it on a
solderless breadboard (!), and had no problems getting it to work. With your
newfound PCB skills, should be a snap to get something like this working. I
tested it by counting waveforms on my oscilloscope, so your mileage may
vary.

The resonant frequency is near

f0 = 1/2.pi.sqrt(L1Ct)

where Ct = C1 + C2||Cbe + Ca + Ccb

Cbe is the capacitance between base and emitter of Q1, which is varied with
base voltage; Ccb is the 'fixed' capacitance between emitter and base of Q1;
and, Ca is the capacitance of the wire antenna. I'm unsure about how to
calculate the power output of the thing, but I'm guessing its tiny. I was
able to sweep the FM band (using a 0.1uH inductor) pretty reliably, and it
knocked out radios in other parts of my house when I swept past them.

The Q of the inductor should be as good as you can make. You can buy highQ
inductors. At this value, an aircore is probably pretty good. Otherwise,
your resonator won't stay on frequency. It'll drift with temperature, and
probably the phase of the moon, as well.

Regards,
Bob Monsen