Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 12th 04, 01:36 PM
Troglodite
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So a 50 resistor serves as my dummy load and a meter connected to
the dummy load indicates around 10 volts RMS. If I did my homework that
would indicate around 2 watt output. All this at B+ of 200v and an anode
current of about 35mA (I am running the transmitter off an adjustable bench
tube power supply at this point).

Does all this compare with the numbers you get with your transmitter??
I will need to build a power supply for the final version and would be
interested to know what you use for B+. In order to get 5 Watts I would have
to crank up the B+ quite a bit.

Actually I don't care at this point since I am still practicing for my code
exam, so I can't even use the transmitter right now.

How do you monitor your transmitting tone with a device like this.


I run my 6V6's at about 325 volts on the plate, 250 on the screen. The plate is
loaded to about 40ma, which is about 13 watts input. You can push it beyond
this, but there's really no point since you have to quadruple your power to
gain one S unit on the receiving end. You'll get about 8 watts out which is
fine. If you want something heftier, you can go to a 6L6, 807 or 6146 tube.
There is a compromise with single tube transmitters though, as the power goes
up they tend to chirp, that is, the frequency slides a bit as they are keyed.
It's not objectionable on the 6V6 transmitters, which is why I favor this power
level.

I started out in 1954 with a surplus ARC-5 receiver and a simple 6V6
transmitter. With it I gained code proficiency and managed to work 28 states
before my Novice licence expired. (They were only good for a year back then.)

For monitoring, you can just use your receiver with the antenna disconnected,
or you can construct any number of monitor devices which you will find in the
ARRL handbook. You can get more sophisticated but you don't have to. There is a
special satisfaction in communicating with very simple equipment.

Doug Moore KB9TMY

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 12th 04, 10:47 PM
Uwe
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug, that is much more power than I had hoped to get.
I am unsure about the max. values for the 6v6, therefore I stayed low.

When I increase the plate voltage to 325V my 2. grid runs about 280V and the
plate current increases to about 65 mA. I don't really dare to do that
without knowing the max values on that tube.
I guess I could lower the 2. grid voltage by increasing the value of the
resistor connectd to it.
I don't know if that would lower my plate current to what you get.


And yes I have a few 807's lying around, so eventually I could build
something more powerful, but at this point I need to work on my code,
otherwise all of this is a mute point.

You are right about monitoring the CW, it spills over to my receiver and I
can monitor it there, even if I run the transmitter with a dummy load.

So eventually I guess I could just use an arrangement that on transmitt I
would automatically shorten out my receivers antenna.
Hate to use a computer chip (for example) to do it though, I will have to
look for a lower tech way to accomplish this switching.

regards Uwe


in article , Troglodite at
wrote on 3/12/04 08:36:


I run my 6V6's at about 325 volts on the plate, 250 on the screen. The plate
is
loaded to about 40ma, which is about 13 watts input. You can push it beyond
this, but there's really no point since you have to quadruple your power to
gain one S unit on the receiving end. You'll get about 8 watts out which is
fine. If you want something heftier, you can go to a 6L6, 807 or 6146 tube.
There is a compromise with single tube transmitters though, as the power goes
up they tend to chirp, that is, the frequency slides a bit as they are keyed.
It's not objectionable on the 6V6 transmitters, which is why I favor this
power
level.

I started out in 1954 with a surplus ARC-5 receiver and a simple 6V6
transmitter. With it I gained code proficiency and managed to work 28 states
before my Novice licence expired. (They were only good for a year back then.)

For monitoring, you can just use your receiver with the antenna disconnected,
or you can construct any number of monitor devices which you will find in the
ARRL handbook. You can get more sophisticated but you don't have to. There is
a
special satisfaction in communicating with very simple equipment.

Doug Moore KB9TMY


  #3   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 08:42 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Uwe
writes:

When I increase the plate voltage to 325V my 2. grid runs about 280V and the
plate current increases to about 65 mA. I don't really dare to do that
without knowing the max values on that tube.
I guess I could lower the 2. grid voltage by increasing the value of the
resistor connectd to it.
I don't know if that would lower my plate current to what you get.


Uwe,

How are you tuning up the transmitter? Are you adjusting the plate capacitor
for minimum current?

73 de Jim, N2EY
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 12:12 PM
Paul_Morphy
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Uwe" wrote in message
...
They have an alternative way to tune by inserting a mA meter into the key
lead but I do not get the little dips in current they are describing. For

me
it is more of a linear increase in current from the highest capacity

setting
(lowest current) to the setting where the cap is all open and the current

is
highest.


It seems as though your Plate Tuning capacitor has too little capacitance to
resonate at the frequency you are using.

The way things are the max output occurs more or less at the lowest anode
current of my power supply (about 35mA at 200V B+).

Why do I tune for minimum current??


The combination of the Plate Tuning capacitor and the inductor in the output
circuit comprise a parallel-resonant tuned circuit, which has its highest
impedance at resonance. Therefore, when the two are resonant, current is at
its lowest point. Tuning for maximum voltage on the antenna is not
guaranteed to get the plate circuit on frequency, at least not the frequency
you want. On many of those older tube transmitters, there was enough range
in the plate tuning capacitor that the circuit could be tuned to the second
harmonic of the desired frequency. Ie, if your desired frequency was 3500
kHz, the circuit could also be tuned to 7000 kHz. Measuring antenna voltage
(which many cheap rigs did, by using a "Relative Output" meter, just an rf
voltmeter connected across the antenna terminal) could lead you to adjust
for the wrong resonance frequency. (In the 1960s the 80-meter Novice subband
was 3.7-3.75 MHz, putting the second harmonic outside of any amateur band
and generating a lot of QSL cards from the FCC for unsuspecting owners of
transmitters like the Knight T-60, which had only a relative output meter.)

If you can find someone who has a "dip meter," you can determine whether
your plate circuit can be tuned to resonance, and, if not, how far off it
is. A dip meter is an oscillator with an exposed coil, and an analog meter
that dips when the oscillator is positioned near a resonant circuit. You
adjust the dip meter knob until its meter dips and read the frequency off
the dial. The dial calibration is not great, but if you have a
general-coverage receiver you can listen for the oscillator signal.

I would also investigate the coupling capacitor from the tube plate to the
ungrounded terminal of the plate tuning capacitor. It may have dried out and
shorted. Carefully measure for dc voltage from the ungrounded terminal of
the plate tuning capacitor to the chassis. There shouldn't be any. If there
is, replace the capacitor. As a rule of thumb, its voltage rating should be
4x the plate voltage, capacitance about 1000-1500 pF.

"PM"





  #6   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 03:40 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Paul_Morphy" writes:

The combination of the Plate Tuning capacitor and the inductor in the output
circuit comprise a parallel-resonant tuned circuit,


The AC-1 uses a pi network output circuit.

73 de Jim, N2EY
  #7   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 04:30 PM
Paul_Morphy
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Paul_Morphy" writes:

The combination of the Plate Tuning capacitor and the inductor in the

output
circuit comprise a parallel-resonant tuned circuit,


The AC-1 uses a pi network output circuit.


That's right, but the plate tuning cap and the inductor still operate as a
parallel-resonant circuit. That's why plate current dips at resonance. In
conjunction with the loading capacitor, the pi network also serves to match
the plate impedance to the load impedance.

73,

"PM"


  #8   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 04:30 PM
Paul_Morphy
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Paul_Morphy" writes:

The combination of the Plate Tuning capacitor and the inductor in the

output
circuit comprise a parallel-resonant tuned circuit,


The AC-1 uses a pi network output circuit.


That's right, but the plate tuning cap and the inductor still operate as a
parallel-resonant circuit. That's why plate current dips at resonance. In
conjunction with the loading capacitor, the pi network also serves to match
the plate impedance to the load impedance.

73,

"PM"


  #9   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 03:40 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Paul_Morphy" writes:

The combination of the Plate Tuning capacitor and the inductor in the output
circuit comprise a parallel-resonant tuned circuit,


The AC-1 uses a pi network output circuit.

73 de Jim, N2EY
  #10   Report Post  
Old March 14th 04, 03:40 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Uwe
writes:

in article , N2EY at
wrote on 3/13/04 15:42:

In article , Uwe


writes:

When I increase the plate voltage to 325V my 2. grid runs about 280V and

the
plate current increases to about 65 mA. I don't really dare to do that
without knowing the max values on that tube.
I guess I could lower the 2. grid voltage by increasing the value of the
resistor connectd to it.
I don't know if that would lower my plate current to what you get.


Uwe,

How are you tuning up the transmitter? Are you adjusting the plate

capacitor
for minimum current?

73 de Jim, N2EY


Jim,

Sofar I have connected a scope to the antenna and tuned for max waveform eg.
highest voltage. That is also the setting where my dummy load with bulbs is
brightest.
The original instructions for the AC1 explain how to tune but use
expressions like 'turn the capacitor clockwise' which is useless to me when
I am not using their exact part.


The tuneup procedure (adapted to your setup) is as follows:

1) Set both output capacitors to maximum capacitance (plates fully meshed)
2) Close the key and adjust the "plate" capacitor (the one nearest the tube in
the circuit diagram) for minimum plate current. Maximum output should occur at
the same time. Release the key.
3) Unmesh the "load" capacitor about 10 degrees or so
4) Repeat Step 2. The plate current minimum should be higher and there should
be more output.
5) Repeat steps 2, 3, and 4 in order until you get maximum rated plate current
at the minimum setting of the plate capacitor.

They have an alternative way to tune by inserting a mA meter into the key
lead but I do not get the little dips in current they are describing.


Then there is something wrong with your output circuit. What capacitors and
coil are you using? The original design had a 365 pf variable "plate" capacitor
and a similar capacitor for the "load" adjustment. The coil was different for
each band.

What components are you using in the output circuit? Plate tuning capacitor.
coil, load capaticor, plate RF choke, coupling capacitor? Any of them could be
the cause of your problem.

For me
it is more of a linear increase in current from the highest capacity setting
(lowest current) to the setting where the cap is all open and the current is
highest.


That says to me that your plate C is too low.

The way things are the max output occurs more or less at the lowest anode
current of my power supply (about 35mA at 200V B+).


Which should happen somewhere in the midrange of the plate capacitor
adjustment.

Why do I tune for minimum current??

Because that's when the impedance of the load circuit is closest to matching
the tube's output.

73 de Jim, N2EY



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 May 28th 04 07:53 PM
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 January 23rd 04 09:19 PM
Heathkit SB-200 Amplifier Problem Help? LJ Boatanchors 10 December 13th 03 03:26 AM
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem Chris Equipment 2 July 19th 03 02:57 AM
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem Chris Equipment 0 July 17th 03 05:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017