Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uwe wrote in message ...
in article , N2EY at PAMNO wrote on 4/5/04 18:59: In article , Uwe writes: I will just have to fiddle a bit more with the pi network (since at the B+ voltages suggested here my plate current would be way high) and I will have to live with the chirp. Are you getting a "dip" in plate current? If not, the coil is probably too large or too small. Unless you get a real dip, the output network isn;t right. I have used a very similar transmitter with 350 volts on the plate, and the dip is clean and pronounced. Jim, the original docs I got for this tx call, at 40 m, for a 15 turn coil on the coil form provided with the kit, which I hear was 1.25" diameter. If I use the formula for air coils this turns out to be roughly a 22 microhenry coil. 22 microhenries? I get more like 8 microhenries using the formula L = (a * a * n * n)/([9 * a] + [10 * b]) where a = radius of coil in inches b = length of winding in inches n = number of turns The coil which works best with my tx is 8 turns on a 1,125" ceramic core. But do you get a dip? Be aware that the AC-1 went through some changes in its lifetime. Some models used a filter choke, others did not. Some used a 730 uuf loading capacitor, others just a single-section 365 uuf one. Coils changed too. To get guess work out of it I just bought and built a L/C meter and measured my coil to have 2.7 microhenry. So I am way off, but it works, sort of. The air caps are 36 to 420pf at the plate and 15 to 728pf at the antenna, so that seem right. All this happens with B+200V and 35 mA plate current. LC = 25,330/(f * f) so for 7 MHz, the LC constant is 516. Your 2.7 uH coil should resonate with 191 uuf. Older ARRL handbooks give typical values for pi network for 50 Ohm antenna loads and my values are in range for the caps but my coil is too small. The ouput voltage on my antenna measured with a scope is up to 75 volts peak to peak, with a 50 Ohm load that would mean I get more out of the tx than I put into it and I am not of the sort who says this might happen. So my conclusion is, and tell me if this sounds right, that I have an antenna which is far from 50 ohm resistive at 40m and that that makes everything weird. That's defintitely part of the problem. What antenna are you using? Have you tried a resistor or lamp load? The dips in plate current are nearly imperceptible and they are not aided by my 250mA full scale meter. They may be 2 or 3 mA. I tune with the help of my scope. The meter tells more. You can use a pilot light (#47, 150 mA) instead of a meter. Sudden thought: Where is the meter connected? Are you reading plate current, or plate-and-screen current combined? Here's something else to try: Often trouble of this sort is due to the RF choke used. What RFCs are you suing, particularly in the plate circuit? Although the LC meter may say they are a certain L, in real life they may have all sorts of unwanted resonances. To test this idea out, do the following: - Remove the plate RFC - Connect the antenna end of the plate coil to the B+ where the RFC used to be connected. This point should already be bypassed to ground through a disk capacitor of about .01 uF - Disconnect the "loading" capacitor - Remove the plate coupling capacitor. What you will then have is the 200 volts being fed to the plate through the coil, with one end of the coil going to the plate supply and the other end connected directly to the plate of the 6V6. The plate tuning capacitor is connected between the plate of the 6V6 and ground. End result is no plate RFC and a parallel resonant circuit. There's no connection for an antenna yet, but that's not important right now. Test out the rig and look for the plate current dip. It should be very obvious because there is no load connected. This is just a temporary setup to see if the RFC is OK. 73 es GL de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message om... This is just a temporary setup to see if the RFC is OK. My recollection is hazy but I seem to recall that when the loading cap was open too far for the load the pi net was seeing, the dip got very shallow. I'll bet his antenna is outside the range it can match. Time for Uwe to gather up some of that coil-winding stuff and make a tuner. 73, "PM" |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Uwe
writes: in article , N2EY at wrote on 4/6/04 12:29: Uwe wrote in message ... in article , N2EY at PAMNO wrote on 4/5/04 18:59: In article , Uwe writes: I will just have to fiddle a bit more with the pi network (since at the B+ voltages suggested here my plate current would be way high) and I will have to live with the chirp. Are you getting a "dip" in plate current? If not, the coil is probably too large or too small. Unless you get a real dip, the output network isn;t right. I have used a very similar transmitter with 350 volts on the plate, and the dip is clean and pronounced. Jim, the original docs I got for this tx call, at 40 m, for a 15 turn coil on the coil form provided with the kit, which I hear was 1.25" diameter. If I use the formula for air coils this turns out to be roughly a 22 microhenry coil. 22 microhenries? I get more like 8 microhenries using the formula L = (a * a * n * n)/([9 * a] + [10 * b]) where a = radius of coil in inches b = length of winding in inches n = number of turns Well, the way I use the formula is 1.25*1.25*15*15/((9*1.25)+(10*0.45)) = 351.5/15.75 = 22.3 O.45 is the length of the 15 windings. Do I not use the formula properly?? You used the coil *diameter* where you should have used the coil *radius*. A coil with diameter of 1.25 inch has a radius of 0.625 inch. Compute 0.625*0.625*15*15/((9*0.625)+(10*0.45)) = and see what you get. My meter is built into my bench power supply (thats why it reads up to 250mA), so I am measuring plate and screen current. I put in a second meter which would only measure the plate current but its reading is practicly identical to the first one, as if there was no grid current. That's odd. My antenna is a dipole of about 75ft. length each side, connected with a 50 ohm coax, no balun or such things. 150 feet total length? That's not resonant on 40 meters, and your SWR with 50 ohm coax is probably quite high. A half-wave 40 meter dipole is about 66-67 feet long (33 feet each side), and will have a fairly low SWR on 40 meters when fed with 50 ohm coax. The next length that will give a fairly low 40 meter SWR is about 205 feet overall (102 feet each side). Such a dipole is one-and-a-half waves long. These are "ballpark" figures, not exact ones. How high is your dipole? I agree with Paul Morphy that a simple dummy load is best for testing. His suggestion of paralleled noninductive resistors is excellent. I will need a few days to try out some of the things you and also Paul suggested and it might really be a good idea to get an SWR meter and a tuner. That will work, but first get the rig working correctly into a dummy load. All in due time and I will surely get back to you. If it takes me a while to respond, it's because I'm away from the computer. Thanks for the help You're welcome. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Uwe
writes: in article , N2EY at wrote on 4/6/04 12:29: Uwe wrote in message ... in article , N2EY at PAMNO wrote on 4/5/04 18:59: In article , Uwe writes: I will just have to fiddle a bit more with the pi network (since at the B+ voltages suggested here my plate current would be way high) and I will have to live with the chirp. Are you getting a "dip" in plate current? If not, the coil is probably too large or too small. Unless you get a real dip, the output network isn;t right. I have used a very similar transmitter with 350 volts on the plate, and the dip is clean and pronounced. Jim, the original docs I got for this tx call, at 40 m, for a 15 turn coil on the coil form provided with the kit, which I hear was 1.25" diameter. If I use the formula for air coils this turns out to be roughly a 22 microhenry coil. 22 microhenries? I get more like 8 microhenries using the formula L = (a * a * n * n)/([9 * a] + [10 * b]) where a = radius of coil in inches b = length of winding in inches n = number of turns Well, the way I use the formula is 1.25*1.25*15*15/((9*1.25)+(10*0.45)) = 351.5/15.75 = 22.3 O.45 is the length of the 15 windings. Do I not use the formula properly?? You used the coil *diameter* where you should have used the coil *radius*. A coil with diameter of 1.25 inch has a radius of 0.625 inch. Compute 0.625*0.625*15*15/((9*0.625)+(10*0.45)) = and see what you get. My meter is built into my bench power supply (thats why it reads up to 250mA), so I am measuring plate and screen current. I put in a second meter which would only measure the plate current but its reading is practicly identical to the first one, as if there was no grid current. That's odd. My antenna is a dipole of about 75ft. length each side, connected with a 50 ohm coax, no balun or such things. 150 feet total length? That's not resonant on 40 meters, and your SWR with 50 ohm coax is probably quite high. A half-wave 40 meter dipole is about 66-67 feet long (33 feet each side), and will have a fairly low SWR on 40 meters when fed with 50 ohm coax. The next length that will give a fairly low 40 meter SWR is about 205 feet overall (102 feet each side). Such a dipole is one-and-a-half waves long. These are "ballpark" figures, not exact ones. How high is your dipole? I agree with Paul Morphy that a simple dummy load is best for testing. His suggestion of paralleled noninductive resistors is excellent. I will need a few days to try out some of the things you and also Paul suggested and it might really be a good idea to get an SWR meter and a tuner. That will work, but first get the rig working correctly into a dummy load. All in due time and I will surely get back to you. If it takes me a while to respond, it's because I'm away from the computer. Thanks for the help You're welcome. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message om... This is just a temporary setup to see if the RFC is OK. My recollection is hazy but I seem to recall that when the loading cap was open too far for the load the pi net was seeing, the dip got very shallow. I'll bet his antenna is outside the range it can match. Time for Uwe to gather up some of that coil-winding stuff and make a tuner. 73, "PM" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , N2EY at
wrote on 4/6/04 12:29: Uwe wrote in message ... in article , N2EY at PAMNO wrote on 4/5/04 18:59: In article , Uwe writes: I will just have to fiddle a bit more with the pi network (since at the B+ voltages suggested here my plate current would be way high) and I will have to live with the chirp. Are you getting a "dip" in plate current? If not, the coil is probably too large or too small. Unless you get a real dip, the output network isn;t right. I have used a very similar transmitter with 350 volts on the plate, and the dip is clean and pronounced. Jim, the original docs I got for this tx call, at 40 m, for a 15 turn coil on the coil form provided with the kit, which I hear was 1.25" diameter. If I use the formula for air coils this turns out to be roughly a 22 microhenry coil. 22 microhenries? I get more like 8 microhenries using the formula L = (a * a * n * n)/([9 * a] + [10 * b]) where a = radius of coil in inches b = length of winding in inches n = number of turns Well, the way I use the formula is 1.25*1.25*15*15/((9*1.25)+(10*0.45)) = 351.5/15.75 = 22.3 O.45 is the length of the 15 windings. Do I not use the formula properly?? My meter is built into my bench power supply (thats why it reads up to 250mA), so I am measuring plate and screen current. I put in a second meter which would only measure the plate current but its reading is practicly identical to the first one, as if there was no grid current. My antenna is a dipole of about 75ft. length each side, connected with a 50 ohm coax, no balun or such things. I will need a few days to try out some of the things you and also Paul suggested and it might really be a good idea to get an SWR meter and a tuner. All in due time and I will surely get back to you. Thanks for the help Uwe The coil which works best with my tx is 8 turns on a 1,125" ceramic core. But do you get a dip? Be aware that the AC-1 went through some changes in its lifetime. Some models used a filter choke, others did not. Some used a 730 uuf loading capacitor, others just a single-section 365 uuf one. Coils changed too. To get guess work out of it I just bought and built a L/C meter and measured my coil to have 2.7 microhenry. So I am way off, but it works, sort of. The air caps are 36 to 420pf at the plate and 15 to 728pf at the antenna, so that seem right. All this happens with B+200V and 35 mA plate current. LC = 25,330/(f * f) so for 7 MHz, the LC constant is 516. Your 2.7 uH coil should resonate with 191 uuf. Older ARRL handbooks give typical values for pi network for 50 Ohm antenna loads and my values are in range for the caps but my coil is too small. The ouput voltage on my antenna measured with a scope is up to 75 volts peak to peak, with a 50 Ohm load that would mean I get more out of the tx than I put into it and I am not of the sort who says this might happen. So my conclusion is, and tell me if this sounds right, that I have an antenna which is far from 50 ohm resistive at 40m and that that makes everything weird. That's defintitely part of the problem. What antenna are you using? Have you tried a resistor or lamp load? The dips in plate current are nearly imperceptible and they are not aided by my 250mA full scale meter. They may be 2 or 3 mA. I tune with the help of my scope. The meter tells more. You can use a pilot light (#47, 150 mA) instead of a meter. Sudden thought: Where is the meter connected? Are you reading plate current, or plate-and-screen current combined? Here's something else to try: Often trouble of this sort is due to the RF choke used. What RFCs are you suing, particularly in the plate circuit? Although the LC meter may say they are a certain L, in real life they may have all sorts of unwanted resonances. To test this idea out, do the following: - Remove the plate RFC - Connect the antenna end of the plate coil to the B+ where the RFC used to be connected. This point should already be bypassed to ground through a disk capacitor of about .01 uF - Disconnect the "loading" capacitor - Remove the plate coupling capacitor. What you will then have is the 200 volts being fed to the plate through the coil, with one end of the coil going to the plate supply and the other end connected directly to the plate of the 6V6. The plate tuning capacitor is connected between the plate of the 6V6 and ground. End result is no plate RFC and a parallel resonant circuit. There's no connection for an antenna yet, but that's not important right now. Test out the rig and look for the plate current dip. It should be very obvious because there is no load connected. This is just a temporary setup to see if the RFC is OK. 73 es GL de Jim, N2EY |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, after my calculation of the coil were wrong I thought it was about time
to check everything and I did and to try and distinguish between radius and diameter... Using the L/C meter I wound a proper coil, I checked the calibration of my plate current meter, I did a more thorough check of the grid current (it is between 1 and 2 mA) and so on and so forth. And I did connect a dummy load (even though they don't respond or send out QSL cards when you tranmit into them). None of the thing did make any real difference and the dip, the elusive dip, was in the order of magnitude of maybe 2 mA, nearly impossible to see on my meter. Then I changed the circuit around as you suggested, testing the RFC and I got a dip the likes of which I had never seen. The meter went slowly from about 30 mA to 50 mA and then dropped to about 25 mA, I couldn't miss it. But what does it mean. I gather my RFC is not ok. What is wrong?? I used a Series 4590 high current filter inductor I had around, it has the Digi Key number DN 4528. Happy about the dip but still not clear on the deeper reasons... 73 Uwe Here's something else to try: Often trouble of this sort is due to the RF choke used. What RFCs are you suing, particularly in the plate circuit? Although the LC meter may say they are a certain L, in real life they may have all sorts of unwanted resonances. To test this idea out, do the following: - Remove the plate RFC - Connect the antenna end of the plate coil to the B+ where the RFC used to be connected. This point should already be bypassed to ground through a disk capacitor of about .01 uF - Disconnect the "loading" capacitor - Remove the plate coupling capacitor. What you will then have is the 200 volts being fed to the plate through the coil, with one end of the coil going to the plate supply and the other end connected directly to the plate of the 6V6. The plate tuning capacitor is connected between the plate of the 6V6 and ground. End result is no plate RFC and a parallel resonant circuit. There's no connection for an antenna yet, but that's not important right now. Test out the rig and look for the plate current dip. It should be very obvious because there is no load connected. This is just a temporary setup to see if the RFC is OK. 73 es GL de Jim, N2EY |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Uwe
writes: Using the L/C meter I wound a proper coil, I checked the calibration of my plate current meter, I did a more thorough check of the grid current (it is between 1 and 2 mA) and so on and so forth. I think you mean "screen current". And I did connect a dummy load (even though they don't respond or send out QSL cards when you tranmit into them). Yup! None of the thing did make any real difference and the dip, the elusive dip, was in the order of magnitude of maybe 2 mA, nearly impossible to see on my meter. Then I changed the circuit around as you suggested, testing the RFC and I got a dip the likes of which I had never seen. The meter went slowly from about 30 mA to 50 mA and then dropped to about 25 mA, I couldn't miss it. But what does it mean. I gather my RFC is not ok. What is wrong?? I used a Series 4590 high current filter inductor I had around, it has the Digi Key number DN 4528. The RFC you're using is not meant for the appliucation. It's intended for much lower frequencies. You can't tell that just by looking at it. RF choke design is a matter of compromises. For example, the use of a powdered iron or ferrite core will raise the inductance. But that same core does not work at all frequencies, and may saturate from DC current in the core. The biggest problem is called "distributed capacitance". In order to get lots of inductance, you put on lots of turns, closely spaced. But each turn has a small amount of capacitance to the turns next to it. All these small capacitances add up, and as the frequency is increased they become significant to the total reactance of the choke. At one or more frequencies the choke will actually resonate - these are called "self resonant" frequencies. At some frequencies the choke may act like an inductor of much lower inductance, or even like a capacitor, because of the self resonances. Self resonance in a choke can be found with a suitable dip meter. RF chokes that are meant for applications like the AC-1 are designed to have self-resonant frequencies far from the amateur bands. Happy about the dip but still not clear on the deeper reasons... Hope this helps. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , N2EY at
PAMNO wrote on 4/8/04 07:59: In article , Uwe writes: Using the L/C meter I wound a proper coil, I checked the calibration of my plate current meter, I did a more thorough check of the grid current (it is between 1 and 2 mA) and so on and so forth. I think you mean "screen current". And I did connect a dummy load (even though they don't respond or send out QSL cards when you tranmit into them). Yup! None of the thing did make any real difference and the dip, the elusive dip, was in the order of magnitude of maybe 2 mA, nearly impossible to see on my meter. Then I changed the circuit around as you suggested, testing the RFC and I got a dip the likes of which I had never seen. The meter went slowly from about 30 mA to 50 mA and then dropped to about 25 mA, I couldn't miss it. But what does it mean. I gather my RFC is not ok. What is wrong?? I used a Series 4590 high current filter inductor I had around, it has the Digi Key number DN 4528. The RFC you're using is not meant for the appliucation. It's intended for much lower frequencies. You can't tell that just by looking at it. RF choke design is a matter of compromises. For example, the use of a powdered iron or ferrite core will raise the inductance. But that same core does not work at all frequencies, and may saturate from DC current in the core. The biggest problem is called "distributed capacitance". In order to get lots of inductance, you put on lots of turns, closely spaced. But each turn has a small amount of capacitance to the turns next to it. All these small capacitances add up, and as the frequency is increased they become significant to the total reactance of the choke. At one or more frequencies the choke will actually resonate - these are called "self resonant" frequencies. At some frequencies the choke may act like an inductor of much lower inductance, or even like a capacitor, because of the self resonances. Self resonance in a choke can be found with a suitable dip meter. RF chokes that are meant for applications like the AC-1 are designed to have self-resonant frequencies far from the amateur bands. Happy about the dip but still not clear on the deeper reasons... Hope this helps. 73 de Jim, N2EY Yes this is all very helpful. Indeed I was thinking that it would have taken me a very long time to figure this out by myself, if at all. I put another choke in there, a Hammond 1535B, the self resonant min. frequ. is 1.3Mhz. I guess it does take some deeper inside what parameters to look for since this one improves things slightly but not yet altogether (slightly more pronounced dip). Who carries the sort of chokes you were refering to? 73 Uwe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's | Boatanchors | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications | Boatanchors | |||
Heathkit SB-200 Amplifier Problem Help? | Boatanchors | |||
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem | Equipment | |||
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem | Equipment |