![]() |
|
Thanks, Jeff and Ken, for the info about modern mica capacitors. I
haven't dealt with the high-power RF world since a previous life as a radar technician, long ago now, so hadn't realized they're still preferred for some applications. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thanks, Jeff and Ken, for the info about modern mica capacitors. I
haven't dealt with the high-power RF world since a previous life as a radar technician, long ago now, so hadn't realized they're still preferred for some applications. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Sorry to say that I don't have a recommendation for a vendor for small
quantities of the 1% parts, but how many did you need? I know I have some of the 1.0nF 0805s, and might get lucky on the others too. I have a whole bunch of some value fairly close to 4.7nF, and I'm just not remembering which it is. Might be 3.9, might be 5.6 or 6.8, if not 4.7. Anyway, if you're not looking for too many, I'd be happy to help you out. But even if you buy a bunch of 5% ones, that might not be a bad way to go. I just measured about 20 470pF 5% ones I happened to have on my desk, and they were between 468 and 488, about +/-2% from the midpoint. I'm not remembering where I saw the 60ppm number. It surprised me, though, and I made a mental note to always check the specs on the caps I'm using, if it's important. It was fairly recently, and it was a surprise because I had always equated 30ppm with NPO/C0G. I just did a Google search for "C0G 60ppm" and got several hits, but in looking at some of them, I found 60ppm associated only with NPO, and not with C0G, so perhaps I'm wrong about C0Gs, at least. I'd be happy to be wrong in this case! A little further looking suggests that EIA CG or C0G officially must be +/-30ppm max, and EIA CH is +/-60ppm. Cheers, Tom "Fred Bartoli" r_AndThisToo wrote in message ... "Tom Bruhns" a écrit dans le message news: ... snip o It's possible to get 1% C0G caps. Tom, do you know any supplier of such for proto quantity ? I need 1n/0805 and 4.7n/1206. I can't find any of these and I feel I'll have to buy a handfull of 5%, sort them and maybe adapt the resitors values to what the lot would kindly give me. Not very entertaining. o A C0G is probably about the cheapest electronic component you'll find with a maximum 30ppm/C temperature coefficient (though beware, some C0Gs I've seen are rated up to 60ppm/C). Do you have any name ? Thanks, Fred. |
Sorry to say that I don't have a recommendation for a vendor for small
quantities of the 1% parts, but how many did you need? I know I have some of the 1.0nF 0805s, and might get lucky on the others too. I have a whole bunch of some value fairly close to 4.7nF, and I'm just not remembering which it is. Might be 3.9, might be 5.6 or 6.8, if not 4.7. Anyway, if you're not looking for too many, I'd be happy to help you out. But even if you buy a bunch of 5% ones, that might not be a bad way to go. I just measured about 20 470pF 5% ones I happened to have on my desk, and they were between 468 and 488, about +/-2% from the midpoint. I'm not remembering where I saw the 60ppm number. It surprised me, though, and I made a mental note to always check the specs on the caps I'm using, if it's important. It was fairly recently, and it was a surprise because I had always equated 30ppm with NPO/C0G. I just did a Google search for "C0G 60ppm" and got several hits, but in looking at some of them, I found 60ppm associated only with NPO, and not with C0G, so perhaps I'm wrong about C0Gs, at least. I'd be happy to be wrong in this case! A little further looking suggests that EIA CG or C0G officially must be +/-30ppm max, and EIA CH is +/-60ppm. Cheers, Tom "Fred Bartoli" r_AndThisToo wrote in message ... "Tom Bruhns" a écrit dans le message news: ... snip o It's possible to get 1% C0G caps. Tom, do you know any supplier of such for proto quantity ? I need 1n/0805 and 4.7n/1206. I can't find any of these and I feel I'll have to buy a handfull of 5%, sort them and maybe adapt the resitors values to what the lot would kindly give me. Not very entertaining. o A C0G is probably about the cheapest electronic component you'll find with a maximum 30ppm/C temperature coefficient (though beware, some C0Gs I've seen are rated up to 60ppm/C). Do you have any name ? Thanks, Fred. |
According to information I have, the C0 means zero nominal tempco, and
the G means +/-30 ppm. There are various other letters (unfortunately not in order) representing tolerances from +/-10 to +/-2500 ppm. (There's also the letter O meaning "not specified" and P meaning "see applicable specification".) +/-60 is H, so a 0 +/-60 ppm part would be C0H, not C0G. This series of suffix letters is used for temperature compensating types (e.g., M7 (P100), R2 (N220)) as well, so R2G would be -220 +/-30 ppm, M7H would be +100 +/-60 pmm, etc. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Tom Bruhns wrote: Sorry to say that I don't have a recommendation for a vendor for small quantities of the 1% parts, but how many did you need? I know I have some of the 1.0nF 0805s, and might get lucky on the others too. I have a whole bunch of some value fairly close to 4.7nF, and I'm just not remembering which it is. Might be 3.9, might be 5.6 or 6.8, if not 4.7. Anyway, if you're not looking for too many, I'd be happy to help you out. But even if you buy a bunch of 5% ones, that might not be a bad way to go. I just measured about 20 470pF 5% ones I happened to have on my desk, and they were between 468 and 488, about +/-2% from the midpoint. I'm not remembering where I saw the 60ppm number. It surprised me, though, and I made a mental note to always check the specs on the caps I'm using, if it's important. It was fairly recently, and it was a surprise because I had always equated 30ppm with NPO/C0G. I just did a Google search for "C0G 60ppm" and got several hits, but in looking at some of them, I found 60ppm associated only with NPO, and not with C0G, so perhaps I'm wrong about C0Gs, at least. I'd be happy to be wrong in this case! A little further looking suggests that EIA CG or C0G officially must be +/-30ppm max, and EIA CH is +/-60ppm. Cheers, Tom |
According to information I have, the C0 means zero nominal tempco, and
the G means +/-30 ppm. There are various other letters (unfortunately not in order) representing tolerances from +/-10 to +/-2500 ppm. (There's also the letter O meaning "not specified" and P meaning "see applicable specification".) +/-60 is H, so a 0 +/-60 ppm part would be C0H, not C0G. This series of suffix letters is used for temperature compensating types (e.g., M7 (P100), R2 (N220)) as well, so R2G would be -220 +/-30 ppm, M7H would be +100 +/-60 pmm, etc. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Tom Bruhns wrote: Sorry to say that I don't have a recommendation for a vendor for small quantities of the 1% parts, but how many did you need? I know I have some of the 1.0nF 0805s, and might get lucky on the others too. I have a whole bunch of some value fairly close to 4.7nF, and I'm just not remembering which it is. Might be 3.9, might be 5.6 or 6.8, if not 4.7. Anyway, if you're not looking for too many, I'd be happy to help you out. But even if you buy a bunch of 5% ones, that might not be a bad way to go. I just measured about 20 470pF 5% ones I happened to have on my desk, and they were between 468 and 488, about +/-2% from the midpoint. I'm not remembering where I saw the 60ppm number. It surprised me, though, and I made a mental note to always check the specs on the caps I'm using, if it's important. It was fairly recently, and it was a surprise because I had always equated 30ppm with NPO/C0G. I just did a Google search for "C0G 60ppm" and got several hits, but in looking at some of them, I found 60ppm associated only with NPO, and not with C0G, so perhaps I'm wrong about C0Gs, at least. I'd be happy to be wrong in this case! A little further looking suggests that EIA CG or C0G officially must be +/-30ppm max, and EIA CH is +/-60ppm. Cheers, Tom |
I read in sci.electronics.design that Roy Lewallen
wrote (in ) about 'Extracting the 5th Harmonic', on Tue, 23 Mar 2004: This series of suffix letters is used for temperature compensating types (e.g., M7 (P100), R2 (N220)) as well, so R2G would be -220 +/-30 ppm, M7H would be +100 +/-60 pmm, etc. What does D0G mean, if anything? -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk |
I read in sci.electronics.design that Roy Lewallen
wrote (in ) about 'Extracting the 5th Harmonic', on Tue, 23 Mar 2004: This series of suffix letters is used for temperature compensating types (e.g., M7 (P100), R2 (N220)) as well, so R2G would be -220 +/-30 ppm, M7H would be +100 +/-60 pmm, etc. What does D0G mean, if anything? -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk |
John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Roy Lewallen wrote (in ) about 'Extracting the 5th Harmonic', on Tue, 23 Mar 2004: This series of suffix letters is used for temperature compensating types (e.g., M7 (P100), R2 (N220)) as well, so R2G would be -220 +/-30 ppm, M7H would be +100 +/-60 pmm, etc. What does D0G mean, if anything? I don't find D0 listed in my reference. The only one I have with a 0 number is C0, nominally zero tempco. So if it is a legitimate capacitor designation, I don't know what it is. Getting kind of close to April 1, so maybe it's short for D0G B0NE, a kind of ceramic capcitor? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com