Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old March 20th 04, 09:04 PM
Johnny Melvin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design
for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices
and experienced constructors alike?

I suggest that none of the CB-style gadgets of today's
CB-style rigs are necessary and that a reproducible design
having only the facilities of, say, the KW2000, would provide the
basis of any station.

Keeping it simple will increase the chance of success.

I suggest the following....
DDS VFO
VFO display based upon graphic LCD to simulate
the use of a tuning knob-plus-dial.
Tuning knob plus flywheel using optical sensors,
giving the "Feel" associated with traditional rigs.

DSP for the audio and mixing stages, perhaps
with a low IF of ooo 50kHz to resolve the ringing
problems that arise in narrow baseband filters
for CW.

ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA
for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or
running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams.

Any of the established CB types in this NG are welcome to join
this discussion, I only ask that your contributions be
meaningful and not the inane sneering 'n; jeering for which
you are famous.

Bring back the G2DAF rx/tx I say.

johnny g3liv.


  #42   Report Post  
Old March 20th 04, 11:36 PM
Doug Smith W9WI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Airy R. Bean wrote:
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design
for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices
and experienced constructors alike?

...

ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA
for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or
running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams.


IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.

Save it for when one's got some experience under the belt & is
interested in trying something new.

The homebrew design that would, IMHO, bring a lot of new folks to the HB
fold, would be...

A simple, inexpensive, easy to duplicate, linear amplifier. 2-5 watts
in, 50-100 watts out; good for all HF bands; run from 12V. (yes, there
are certain advantages to using 28V, but 12V power supplies are cheap
and ubiquitous. I know I misspelled that!)

It could be used with a wide variety of existing HB QRP transceivers, or
with a variety of commercial QRP gear.
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

  #43   Report Post  
Old March 20th 04, 11:36 PM
Doug Smith W9WI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Airy R. Bean wrote:
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design
for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices
and experienced constructors alike?

...

ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA
for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or
running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams.


IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.

Save it for when one's got some experience under the belt & is
interested in trying something new.

The homebrew design that would, IMHO, bring a lot of new folks to the HB
fold, would be...

A simple, inexpensive, easy to duplicate, linear amplifier. 2-5 watts
in, 50-100 watts out; good for all HF bands; run from 12V. (yes, there
are certain advantages to using 28V, but 12V power supplies are cheap
and ubiquitous. I know I misspelled that!)

It could be used with a wide variety of existing HB QRP transceivers, or
with a variety of commercial QRP gear.
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

  #45   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 12:37 AM
God's gift to women
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Sam" wrote in message
. uk...
In article , No-
. says...


Says the "brain dead CB'er"...

tox


Is this yet another Cber coming to the defence of the cowering coward
RVMJ?


How's the Morse training coming along? Lets hope it's going better than the
potty training!

tox




  #46   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 12:50 AM
Doug Smith W9WI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.


(I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last
week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...)
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

  #47   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 12:50 AM
Doug Smith W9WI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.


(I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last
week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...)
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

  #48   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 12:59 AM
Alun
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Smith W9WI wrote in news:405CE6DD.6060605
@invalid.invalid:

Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.


(I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last
week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...)


The alternative would be pretty silly though, wouldn't it? That is, the
more tests you pass the less power you are allowed. Nobody would upgrade,
would they?
  #49   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 12:59 AM
Alun
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Smith W9WI wrote in news:405CE6DD.6060605
@invalid.invalid:

Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.


(I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last
week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...)


The alternative would be pretty silly though, wouldn't it? That is, the
more tests you pass the less power you are allowed. Nobody would upgrade,
would they?
  #50   Report Post  
Old March 21st 04, 07:13 AM
Airy R. Bean
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you start out with a defeatist attitude, and pass that
defeatism onto your protégés, then, yes, you and they
will be defeated.

"Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message
...
Airy R. Bean wrote:
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design
for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices
and experienced constructors alike?
ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA
for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or
running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams.

IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice
procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a
comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea.
Save it for when one's got some experience under the belt & is
interested in trying something new.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 24th 04 05:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017