Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Airy R. Bean
writes I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices and experienced constructors alike? Elecraft already do a range of these http://www.elecraft.com/ Latter-day Heathkit Brian -- Brian Howie |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices and experienced constructors alike? I suggest that none of the CB-style gadgets of today's CB-style rigs are necessary and that a reproducible design having only the facilities of, say, the KW2000, would provide the basis of any station. Keeping it simple will increase the chance of success. I suggest the following.... DDS VFO VFO display based upon graphic LCD to simulate the use of a tuning knob-plus-dial. Tuning knob plus flywheel using optical sensors, giving the "Feel" associated with traditional rigs. DSP for the audio and mixing stages, perhaps with a low IF of ooo 50kHz to resolve the ringing problems that arise in narrow baseband filters for CW. ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams. Any of the established CB types in this NG are welcome to join this discussion, I only ask that your contributions be meaningful and not the inane sneering 'n; jeering for which you are famous. Bring back the G2DAF rx/tx I say. johnny g3liv. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R. Bean dribbled:
snip Now what has he been reading? Or should I say been read to him! The level of care in the community has definitely dropped. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in
: I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices and experienced constructors alike? I'll go for that - willing to offer some webspace too. See Gareth - I'm not all that bad. I suggest that none of the CB-style gadgets of today's CB-style rigs are necessary and that a reproducible design having only the facilities of, say, the KW2000, would provide the basis of any station. Fine radio the KW2000. Work great. One of my club guys has nothing more recent in his shack for HF use. Keeping it simple will increase the chance of success. Yup. Make it a similar project to the K1 and K2 Elecraft - i.e. you can make it work in stages and use itself as a piece of test gear too. ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams. Steady. You could lose my interest quickly. Any of the established CB types in this NG are welcome to join this discussion, I only ask that your contributions be meaningful and not the inane sneering 'n; jeering for which you are famous. Sure - make it good and you never know what could come of this. Do feel free to email me Gareth - I won't bite - have about 50Gb of webspace doing nothing. Leigh.... -- #!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R. Bean wrote:
I wonder if we as a NG might put together a design for an HF rig that could be built with ease by novices and experienced constructors alike? ... ooo 100mW output allowing the choice of PA for CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams or running barefoot QRP for _REAL_ Radio Hams. IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea. Save it for when one's got some experience under the belt & is interested in trying something new. The homebrew design that would, IMHO, bring a lot of new folks to the HB fold, would be... A simple, inexpensive, easy to duplicate, linear amplifier. 2-5 watts in, 50-100 watts out; good for all HF bands; run from 12V. (yes, there are certain advantages to using 28V, but 12V power supplies are cheap and ubiquitous. I know I misspelled that!) It could be used with a wide variety of existing HB QRP transceivers, or with a variety of commercial QRP gear. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea. (I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...) -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote in news:405CE6DD.6060605
@invalid.invalid: Doug Smith W9WI wrote: IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea. (I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...) The alternative would be pretty silly though, wouldn't it? That is, the more tests you pass the less power you are allowed. Nobody would upgrade, would they? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Handling successfully the vagaries of the communications system is part
of what _REAL_ Ham Radio is all about. If you want 59+ BBC quality then neither Ham Radio nor this thread is for you. CB Radio, perhaps? "Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... (I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote in news:405CE6DD.6060605
@invalid.invalid: Doug Smith W9WI wrote: IMHO... QRP, for the new-to-HF ham whose Morse (and/or voice procedures) isn't all that solid yet... and who's probably using a comprimise antenna... is really not a good idea. (I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...) The alternative would be pretty silly though, wouldn't it? That is, the more tests you pass the less power you are allowed. Nobody would upgrade, would they? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Handling successfully the vagaries of the communications system is part
of what _REAL_ Ham Radio is all about. If you want 59+ BBC quality then neither Ham Radio nor this thread is for you. CB Radio, perhaps? "Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... (I managed to work one of your Foundation licensees on 21MHz PSK31 last week, but it wasn't easy to copy her QRP (and ESP!) signal...) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|