Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Watson A.Name "Watt Sun - the Dark Remover"" wrote in message ... Anthony Matonak wrote: Watson A.Name \"Watt Sun - the Dark Remover\" wrote: Last nite (Tue, 9pm) I watched a prog on PBS that was about getting people to use more renewable resources, hosted by Cameron Diaz (hot blonde movie star), who drives a Prius. They talked about getting every home to have a solar panel, and selling power back to the utility co. She also said that if everyone in the U.S. drove a hybrid vehicle, we could completely eliminate oil shipments from the middle east. Well, I'd go out and buy a Prius, but one of the guys at work has had his new Prius since xmas and it took him 4 months or so to get it after submitting a $500 earnest check to several dealerships to get on their waiting list. They say they're trying to make more of them, but I think they really don't want the prices to fall, since they're expensive to make. In any case I'd like more solar power, but the initial outlay is _not_ cheap. While I'm all for using more renewable resources, and especially ones that are environmentally friendly, it doesn't make sense to cause yourself financial pain doing so. It makes sense to buy the must fuel efficient vehicle that fits your needs but not to overspend simply because it's a little better on the gas mileage. It's not a "little" better, it more than double - 50+ MPG compared to 25! [snip] You could also change your diet to include less animal products. Raising animals to produce food takes many times more resources (which often means energy) as plants alone require. Right, but it's **you** (see above) that said to not cause yourself financial pain. Well, I _try_ to do my part to eat little or no beef, instead eat chicken. But I _have_ to pay a premium to do so, even tho it's cheaper to bring chicken to the table, just because of supply and demand issue. People consume less beef so the price drops below chicken, not because it's cheaper. So I and everyone else hasto pay extra for, helping save resources. Just what you said _didn't_make_ sense_. There are also many alternatives to a Prius. One option would be to get a diesel powered car and use biodiesel or get it converted to run on straight vegetable oil. Another option is to buy an electric car. Again, you're asking for people to make a financial sacrifice when buying an electric vehicle. The last I checked, it cost $46,000 to purchase a RAV4 EV, with a good chunk of that going to the installation of an electric charger in the owner's garage. According to you, that financial pain 'doesn't make sense'. If you simply must have a hybrid vehicle then a much wider selection of them should be available within the next 10 to 15 years. In the next 10 to 15 years, the situation may be much, much worse. The big worry in the near term seems to be China, with 1/5th of the world's population, which may have a growing economy that will gobble up an ever growing part of the world's non-renewable energy resources. In 10-15 years, it may be too late! The price of fuel in europe is already over $5 a gallon, and we Americans are currently bitching about having to pay over $2! Well, wait until it goes up to $3, or more! All those SUV owners in the U.S. will be taking tbe bus to work. Time will tell! Anthony Surprisingly enough some SUV owners actually need the SUV at the time of purchase, I personally drove through snow 70cm deep on a regular basis prior to my recent job change. Just because the people in southern California don't need it doesn't mean no one does. Charles |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Cell Phone Hardline | Antenna | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment |