| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
Mike Tomlinson said...
By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
Joe Stalin wrote:
Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Joe Stalin wrote: Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. sour grapes just because your posts are "political and contentious" ... |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Joe Stalin wrote: Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. sour grapes just because your posts are "political and contentious" ... Nonsense. Where was the 'political and contentious' content? More like Hayter seeing things. getting at Paul Cummins obviously ..... these moderators aren't daft ... |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message ... "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Joe Stalin wrote: Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. sour grapes just because your posts are "political and contentious" ... Nonsense. Where was the 'political and contentious' content? More like Hayter seeing things. getting at Paul Cummins obviously ..... these moderators aren't daft ... they won't let you continue your vendettas there ...tee hee |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
On 26/12/2015 10:26, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Joe Stalin wrote: Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. sour grapes just because your posts are "political and contentious" ... Nonsense. Where was the 'political and contentious' content? More like Hayter seeing things. getting at Paul Cummins obviously ..... these moderators aren't daft ... How does that work then? |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... On 26/12/2015 10:26, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... Joe Stalin wrote: Mike Tomlinson said... By way of crossposting this, I'll let users of these groups know there is now a sane, moderated alternative available where Evans's antics won't be permitted, and where they will be very welcome. Just to let anyone interested know - moderation on uk.ram is 'light touch'. Anything broadly related to amateur radio and related technical matters is welcome. Moderation is carried out on subject matter, not the authors of posts. There is a charter at: http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.radio.am...uk.radio.amate ur.moderated Crossposted. The moderators should be the ones who say what the definitive version is and not the great and good on an upstart little Committee? The text in an explanatory note in rejected articles, says the charter and moderation policy are to be found at http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html No charter listed yet and the moderation policy is to be determined. Doesn't matter, we can make it up as we go along to exclude those we don't want polluting the group. With Schlecky's mitts on the moderation, roll on the wall to wall blogs! He isn't going to be the problem. Hayter is already passing o/t and abusive posts but stopping others for his own reasons. sour grapes just because your posts are "political and contentious" ... Nonsense. Where was the 'political and contentious' content? More like Hayter seeing things. getting at Paul Cummins obviously ..... these moderators aren't daft ... How does that work then? the way it did ... |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
On 22/12/2015 08:07, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
Well, Jim has been allowed to post his idiocy and Cummins' some nonsense. As I predicted, Hayter is turning his blind eye to his chums. Just wait until Frank and Spike decide to pitch in. Not even the masons rejected me .... Of course not, if they took Reay (but I've been reliably informed he had to plead for membership) they'll take anyone. -- Extend ****s law - make 'em wear a cheat sheet 24/7 |
Moderated group uk.radio.amateur.moderated now available
"Fred Roberts" wrote in message ... On 22/12/2015 08:07, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: Well, Jim has been allowed to post his idiocy and Cummins' some nonsense. As I predicted, Hayter is turning his blind eye to his chums. Just wait until Frank and Spike decide to pitch in. Not even the masons rejected me .... Of course not, if they took Reay (but I've been reliably informed he had to plead for membership) they'll take anyone. SHOCKING ... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com