Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle2 wrote:
A cheap digital one from Maplin or RS will be just as accurate, save loads by not paying for a name. "CLinT" wrote in message ... I am considering purchasing a Fluke meter to do some alignments & repairs here. Can anyone reccomend a Fluke meter model or anothere brand model? 73 & thanks for all replies, CLinT remove ... "SO" to reply I prefer a Fluke anyway. This is why: When measuring resistances in a cabinet with a running Variable Frequency Drive I got nothing but house numbers with the feature rich no-name-multimeter, that I was using by then. When using a Fluke I got correct readings. The reason: The cheap MM was sensitive to the RFI, which the VFD generated - the Fluke was undisturbed by the massive RFI. That was the model 77 which is old now. But you may find a used one as a bargain. If you want to measure with strong RF-fields present then there is a difference and you get what you pay for. TANSTAAFL. If you go for bench meters also konsider used Keithleys and BBC Metrawatt. Kind regards, Eike |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fluke meters? | Boatanchors | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #629 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #629 | Dx |