Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tim Wescott
writes: John Miles wrote: In article , says... A DDS isn't going to have good enough phase noise. The OP is correct in using a pullable crystal oscillator. Eh? He wants to sweep a filter. You don't particularly care about phase noise when you do that. -- jm ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx Note: My E-mail address has been altered to avoid spam ------------------------------------------------------ That depends on your filter. If you're trying to design a high pole count filter with really steep skirts and you want to verify it's final rejection then yes, you need a low phase noise oscillator. This is probably why he has "low noise" in his title. The "need" for low-noise RF sources was prompted by the electronics industry going hot and heavy on cellular telephony which uses partly phase demodulation and clock recovery circuits in digital electronics. Because of those particular markets, "low noise" has become a Big Buzzword. Whether you have one pole or twelve or whatever, you will NOT need a specific "low noise oscillator!" The very ordinary sweep oscillators of ten, twenty, or thirty years ago are quite fine. retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Antenna | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |