Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "need" for low-noise RF sources was prompted by the
electronics industry going hot and heavy on cellular telephony which uses partly phase demodulation and clock recovery circuits in digital electronics. Because of those particular markets, "low noise" has become a Big Buzzword. Whether you have one pole or twelve or whatever, you will NOT need a specific "low noise oscillator!" The very ordinary sweep oscillators of ten, twenty, or thirty years ago are quite fine. Len, I'm sorry, but I disagree. Concern with phase noise in *all* kinds of communications systems really got hot in the 1970s. Adjacent channel rejection is limited by phase noise performance. It is presently the limiting factor in HF receiver performance. Ham transmitter phase noise can easily be heard during CW DX contests as a keyed increase in noise floor. Measurement of a crystal filter with steep sides could be compromised by PM to AM conversion on the slopes. And in response to earlier posts, DDS synths *can* give very good phase noise performance, but their usefulness is usually limited by quantization spurs unless a cleanup PLL is added. 73, John - K6QQ retired RF circuit design engineer |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Antenna | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |