Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 4hFLc.141721$JR4.5322@attbi_s54,
"Rick Karlquist N6RK" writes: You didn't even mention base spreading resistance, a major figure of merit for RF transistors. Newer designers have considerably lower r-sub-bb-prime than legacy transistors. Look up the hybrid-pi transistor model. SiGe technology's claim to fame is low base spreading resistance. What you say about rbb is true, but SiGe has other 'cool' characteristics, some derived from low rbb, and some due to other effects of the 'strained' silicon?... Ignoring the rbb itself, SiGe tends also to have very low 1/f noise and good LF noise in general. Also, it tends to have high Beta (at LF.) So, where an RF transistor might tend to have a Beta of 20-50, an SiGE part might be 100-300 or higher. With the combo of the low rbb (and low 1/f noise), along with the high Beta, the total amount of input current noise and input voltage noise is damned low. SiGe would make good oscillators (for less PM noise) and of course, good preamps. This is one case where GaAs FETS that are very fast, might be undesirable because of their worse 1/F noise characteristics. One big disadvantage of the typical SiGe transistors is that their breakdown voltage is low. However, the tradeoff of breakdown voltage is BETTER for a given frequency response and Beta than a normal Si transistor. The SiGe transistors are also not very expensive. A part that works well with reasonably low distortion and reasonably low noise figure at 600MHz would be significantly less than $1.00. Unless the transistor is too fast for a given layout, SiGe can be used at low frequencies (e.g. VHF) while still avoiding the low frequency noise problems that are common from GaAs FETS and even other fast BJTs. John |