LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 9th 04, 04:05 PM
Prune
 
Posts: n/a
Default 3CX800A7 vs 4CX800A

I read somewhere that the cheaper Svetlana 4CX800A can be used as a
substitute for the Eimac 3CX800A7. Does anyone know if the Svetlana tube
also uses beam forming? Would I notice a difference at audio frequencies?
(I'm serious)
Also, can this tube be used in class A? On Eimac's site, it says it's
designed for class B, but does that mean that it merely won't be as
efficient in class A, or it will blow up, or what?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017